Patna High Court
Ram Chandra Yadav @ Ram Chandra Prasad YadavversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The court held that provisional anticipatory bail may be granted, subject to verification of the petitioner’s criminal antecedent, when the alleged offence lacks possession and the accused has a clean record.
Summary
Ram Chandra Yadav was implicated in a case under Sections 47(a) and 47(f) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40 litres of liquor and 600 kg of fermented jawa‑mahua solution from a public canal bank. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent, no arrest, and that the seized material was not in his possession nor on his private property. The State opposed his prayer for anticipatory bail. The court examined the lack of possession, the public nature of the location, and the petitioner’s clean record, and consequently granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to verification of his antecedent under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The order directs the trial court to confirm the bail if the petitioner is found to have no prior criminal cases, otherwise the bail will be cancelled. The decision balances the presumption of innocence with the need for a factual verification of antecedent.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Sections 47(a) and 47(f) of the Bihar Excise Act.
- Whether the absence of possession and the public nature of the alleged site justify granting anticipatory bail.
Legislation cited
- BNSS — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- excise law
- possession
- public place
- clean antecedent
- Section 482 CrPC
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7121 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-453 Year-2015 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP.
District- Nawada
======================================================
Ram Chandra Yadav @ Ram Chandra Prasad Yadav S/o Pachu Yadav R/o
Village- Sartakiya, PS- Hisua, Distt.- Nawada
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Verma
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Akbar Ali
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 19-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 47(a) and
47(f) of the Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of
recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a place near eastern bank of
a canal along with 600 kg of fermented jawa mahua solution,
which was destroyed.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was
recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7121 of 2026(2) dt.19-02-2026
2/3
recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner
and is accessible to public at large and he came to be implicated
based on secret information which is the easiest way to
implicate someone wihout holding a proper investigation
moreso when petitioner admittedly is a person with clean
antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks
from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in
connection with G.O P.S. Case No. 453 of 2015 subject to the
conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court
shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the
event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case
then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of
seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this
Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7121 of 2026(2) dt.19-02-2026
3/3
confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a
person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional
anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-
U T
Checking your session…