Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chandan OranversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Chandan Oran, was arrested in connection with an assault and robbery alleged to have occurred on 24.05.2025, involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He applied for bail, claiming no prior criminal record and that the FIR does not specifically allege his participation, describing the charge as general and omnibus. The State opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. The court examined the lack of specific allegation against the petitioner, his period of custody, and the absence of recovered stolen property from his possession. Finding no concrete evidence linking him directly to the injuries and theft, the court decided to grant bail. Bail was ordered on a bond of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of family surety, regular appearance, and possible cancellation on default.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the serious nature of the offences alleged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
  • Whether the FIR specifically implicates the petitioner, justifying denial of bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • assault
  • robbery
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • charges
  • court order

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7150 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2025 Thana- Amdanda District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
                 Chandan Oran S/O Nehru Oran @ Ganju Oran R/O Vill.- Dhangar Sahi
                 Kajha, P.S- Amdanda, District- Bhagalpur

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Rajendra Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026             Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP

                   for the State.

                           2.       The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Amdanda P.S. Case No. 78 of 2025 instituted for the offence

                   under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 121(2), 223,

                   303(2) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                           3.       The prosecution case, in short, is that on

                   24.05.2025, while the informant was conducting a government

                   survey, accused Dilip Oran abused him, obstructed the survey,

                   snatched and damaged his belongings, and later chased him with

                   others. At a lonely place, Dilip Oran, Gannu Oran and Chandan

                   Oran (petitioner) assaulted the informant with lathi and iron rod

                   causing head injury and fracture of both legs, and petitioner also
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7150 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                            2/3




          looted Rs. 1,500/- and a gold takti from his neck.

                  4.      It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner

          that the petitioner is in custody since 24.07.2025. Petitioner

          bears no criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in

          paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

                  5.      It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s

          counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present

          case. From perusal of the FIR, it would manifest that there is no

          specific allegation against the petitioner, rather the same is

          general and omnibus in nature. From perusal of the impugned

          order, injury caused by petitioner is found to be simple in

          nature. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious

          possession of the petitioner.

                  6.      Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                  7.      Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and there being

          no specific allegation against the petitioner, this Court is

          inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                  8.      Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties

          of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7150 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     below/concerned Court in connection with Amdanda P.S. Case

                     No. 78 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:

                             (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the

                     family of the petitioner.

                             (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

                     fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two

                     consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the

                     bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                                                  (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Raj Kishore/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.