Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raghubar SahversusThe State Of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The application under Section 482 is dismissed as infructuous because the original case has already been disposed.

Summary

The petitioner, Raghubar Sah, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 07.05.2018 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in case No. 187 of 2017. The S.D.J.M. reported that the original case had already been disposed of on 10.11.2023 with the petitioner acquitted. The petitioner argued that the pending application had become infructuous and should be dismissed. The State of Bihar raised no objection to the petitioner's request. The Patna High Court, after considering the submissions and the report, held that the application was indeed infructuous and disposed of it.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be entertained when the original case has already been disposed and the petitioner acquitted

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Criminal Procedure
  • Section 482
  • Quash Order
  • Infructuous Application
  • Acquittal
  • High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71571 of 2018
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2017 Thana- KALYANPUR District- Samastipur
                 ======================================================
                 Raghubar Sah S/o Ram Udgar Sah, Resident of Village-Dhrubgama, P.S.-
                 Kalyanpur, District-Samastipur.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Hemant Kumar Karan, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Nityanand, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   09-07-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed

                   under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated

                   07.05.2018 passed by S.D.J.M., Samastipur in Kalyanpur P.S.

                   Case No. 187 of 2017.

                                3. As per the report submitted by the learned

                   S.D.J.M., Samastipur vide letter No.108 of 2026 dated

                   01.06.2026, Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 187 of 2017 has already

                   been disposed of on 10.11.2023, as the petitioner had already

                   been acquitted.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 187 of 2017 has already been disposed

                   of and this case has become infructuous, accordingly, prays that
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71571 of 2018(3) dt.09-07-2026
                                                          2/2




                        the present case may be disposed of.

                                     5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this

                        prayer of the petitioner.

                                     6. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for

                        the parties and the report submitted by the concerned Court, the

                        present Cr. Misc. Application stands disposed of having become

                        infructuous.



                                                (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Utkarsh.k/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.