Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

Provisional anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner subject to bond, sureties and verification of his criminal antecedent.

Summary

The petitioner, Guddu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession at the time of seizure, and is not the owner of the vehicle; moreover, the FIR does not name the informant. The State opposed the bail. The Court granted provisional anticipatory bail conditioned on a Rs. 500 bond with two sureties and directed verification of the petitioner’s criminal antecedent. If any antecedent is found, the bail will not be confirmed; otherwise, it will be confirmed forthwith.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in the case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.
  • Whether the conditions imposed by the Court are appropriate for granting provisional anticipatory bail.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bihar Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • provisional bail
  • criminal antecedent
  • FIR
  • liquor seizure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7164 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-658 Year-2022 Thana- DARIYAPUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Guddu Kumar S/O Bhagirath Rai R/O Village - Samanchak, P.S- Dariyapur,
                 Distt.- Saran at Chapra

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Udai Shankar Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-02-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                             2.    The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered

                   for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise

                   Act.

                             3.    Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of

                   recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle.

                             4.    Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was

                   recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of the

                   seized vehicle and he came to be implicated at the instance of local

                   people, but then the name of the person, who disclosed the name of

                   the petitioner is not disclosed in the FIR, which casts an aspersion on

                   the case of the prosecution.
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7164 of 2026(2) dt.19-02-2026
                                                          2/2




                                 5.     Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

                        anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                                 6.     Considering the submissions made by the learned

                        counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of

                        his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be

                        released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds

                        of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like

                        amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the

                        case is pending/successor court in connection with Dariyapur P.S.

                        Case No. 658 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under

                        Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

                                 7.     It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court

                        shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event

                        if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case then it

                        would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking

                        anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as

                        such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed,

                        but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a person with

                        clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order

                        shall be confirmed forthwith.



                                                  (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.