Patna High Court
Raj Kumar @ Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- R P MISHRA
Holding
The Court grants bail to the petitioners subject to the stipulated conditions.
Summary
The petitioners, Raj Kumar, Biglu Uranw and Ramek Ray, were arrested in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 930 litres of foreign liquor were recovered from a pickup vehicle. They contended that they had no ownership or possession of the vehicle, that no incriminating material linked them to the liquor, and that they had no prior criminal record. The State opposed bail, while the petitioners argued that Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023 had not been complied with. The Court examined the lack of direct evidence against the petitioners, the duration of their custody since 10‑01‑2026, and the statutory non‑compliance, and found sufficient ground to grant bail. Accordingly, the Court ordered release on bail of Rs.15,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions of family surety and regular appearance in court.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
- Whether the non‑compliance of Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023 warrants bail.
- Whether the absence of incriminating material and prior criminal record justifies bail.
Legislation cited
- BNSS, 2023 — s. 103
Subjects
- bail
- prohibition
- excise
- foreign liquor
- Section 30
- Section 32
- criminal procedure
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- BNSS 2023
- custody
- surety
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7259 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Kishanganj
======================================================
1. Raj Kumar @ Raju Kumar S/o Late Ramdev Mahto R/o Village - Mali Tola
Dih, P.S - Nagar (Town Thana), District - Begusarai
2. Biglu Uranw @ Biglu Uraon S/o Late Chamayu Uraon R/o Village -
Sadbhaiya, P.S - Naxalbari, District - Darjeeling, State - West Bengal
3. Ramek Ray S/o Late Wakil Rai R/o Village - Sadbhaiya, P.S - Naxalbari,
District - Darjeeling, State - West Bengal
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Avinash Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Ambrish Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akbar Ali, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
2 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP
for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Madya
Nisedh PS Case No. 27 of 2026 instituted for the offences
under Sections 30(a) & 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and
Excise Act.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 930 liters
foreign liquor was recovered from pickup vehicle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the
present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7259 of 2026(2) dt.10-02-2026
2/3
the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have
got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is
submitted that petitioners are not the onwner of the vehicle and
they have no concern with the same. It is submitted that police
have implicated them on extraneous consideration. The
petitioners are in custody since 10.01.2026 and have got no
criminal antecedent/s. There is no compliance of Section 103 of
the BNSS, 2023.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently
opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances
of the case and the period of custody undergone by the
petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.
7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing
bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) each with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court
below/concerned Court in connection with Madya Nisedh PS
Case No. 27 of 2026, subject to the following conditions:
(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the
family of the petitioner.
(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date
fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7259 of 2026(2) dt.10-02-2026
3/3
consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the
bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Raj Kishore/-
U T
Checking your session…