Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar Sharma @ Pawan Kumar Shrma @ Pawan SharmaversusThe State Of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Sharma, was charged under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly assaulting an informant with an iron rod and injuring his family members. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating the allegations were general, that a land dispute existed between the parties, and that he had no prior criminal record, having been in custody since 27‑06‑2025. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the offences. The court considered the nature of the allegations, the admitted land dispute, the petitioner’s custody period, and his clean antecedent record, and decided to grant bail. Bail was ordered on a bond of Rs.15,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of family surety, regular appearance, and possible cancellation on default.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite being charged with offences under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
  • Whether the period of custody, lack of criminal antecedents, and the existence of a land dispute justify the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • assault
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • land dispute
  • section 191
  • section 352

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72898 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-175 Year-2025 Thana- BASANTPUR District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
                 Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar Sharma @ Pawan Kumar Shrma @ Pawan
                 Sharma S/O Rajkishor Sharma @ Raj Kishor Shrma R/O Vill.- Sendurkha,
                 P.S.-Basantpur, District- Siwan

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State Of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Satyendra Rai, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   13-01-2026                        Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                   APP for the State and perused the case diary.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Basnantpur P.S. Case No. 175 of 2025, instituted for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2),

                   109(1), 303(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                                3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner

                   along with other co-accused person abused and assaulted the

                   informant on his head with an iron-rod with an intention to kill

                   him. It is further alleged that family members of the informant

                   were also assaulted by the accused persons due to which they

                   have sustained injuries.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72898 of 2025(3) dt.13-01-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

          present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No

          incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious

          possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner

          also submits that the allegation levelled against the petitioner is

          general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that there

          is admitted land dispute as also case and counter case between

          the parties. Injury no. 1 of the informant is grievous in nature

          and injury of other family members are simple in nature. The

          petitioner is in custody since 27.06.2025 and has got no criminal

          antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case, case and counter case and taking into account the

          period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is

          inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

          below/concerned Court in connection with Basnantpur P.S. Case

          No. 175 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72898 of 2025(3) dt.13-01-2026
                                                         3/3




                                    (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of

                       the family of the petitioner.

                                    (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

                       fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two

                       consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the

                       bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                                                   (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Rajorshi/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.