Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rajeev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Rajeev Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case involving the minor daughter of an informant and charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He applied for bail, asserting that he has no prior criminal record, was falsely implicated, and that the informant is not an eye‑witness; the victim’s statement under Section 183 did not incriminate him and a medical report showed no recent sexual assault. The State and the informant opposed bail. The court examined the charge sheet, the victim’s statement, and the petitioner’s clean record, finding no material against him. Consequently, the court granted bail subject to a cash bond of Rs.15,000 and two sureties, with conditions regarding family surety and appearance at trial. The bail order was pronounced by Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, given the nature of the offences and the evidentiary material.
  • Whether the absence of incriminating statements by the victim and lack of prior criminal record justify granting bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • kidnapping
  • minor
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • criminal procedure
  • court order
  • evidence

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72930 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2025 Thana- Sri Nagar District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Rajeev Kumar S/o Vimal Yadav Resident of Village-Tamta Tola, Ward no 3,
                 P.S- Maranga, District-Purnea

                                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Raj Kishore Yadav S/o Late Sita Ram Yadav R/o Village- Devinagar, P.S.-
                 Srinagar, District- Purnea

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s      :        Mr. Sumit Kumar Bhagat, Advocate
                                                    Mr. K.K. Pathak, Advocate
                 For the State             :        Ms. Rita Verma, APP
                 For the Informant         :        Mr. Suman Kumar Sawaishy, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   13-01-2026              Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP

                   for the State as also learned counsel for the informant. Perused

                   the case diary.

                            2.       The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Srinagar P.S. Case No. 64 of 2025 instituted for the offence

                   under Sections 137, 96, 115(2), 351(2), 352 & 3(5) of the

                   Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                            3.       Prosecution case, in short, is that petitioner along

                   with co-accused kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant.

                            4.       It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner

                   that the petitioner is in custody since 15.06.2025. Petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72930 of 2025(3) dt.13-01-2026
                                            2/3




          bears no criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in

          paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

                  5.      It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s

          counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present

          case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that informant

          is not the eye witness. According to medical report, there was no

          sign of recent sexual assault. Referring to the statement of the

          victim recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, 2023, it is

          submitted that victim has not stated anything against the

          petitioner. Charge sheet has already been submitted in this case.

                  6.      Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for

          the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of

          bail to the petitioner.

                  7.      Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, there being no

          material against the petitioner even in the statement of the

          victim recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, 2023 and

          charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail

          to the petitioner.

                  8.      Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties

          of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72930 of 2025(3) dt.13-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                     below/concerned Court in connection with Srinagar P.S. Case

                     No. 64 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:

                             (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the

                     family of the petitioner.

                             (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

                     fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two

                     consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the

                     bail bonds of the petitioner.


                                                                 (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

Raj Kishore/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.