Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita.

Summary

Raja Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for bail in connection with Sakra Police Station Case No. 630 of 2024, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, including assault, arson and causing firearm injury to Bindu Devi. The prosecution claimed the petitioner participated in a violent assault and shot Bindu Devi, while the petitioner contended that the medical injury report did not indicate a firearm wound and that the FIR was lodged with undue delay. The petitioner also highlighted a history of animosity between the parties and a counter‑case filed by his mother against the informant. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the specific allegation of firearm injury and the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents. After considering the delay in filing the FIR, the nature of the injury report, and the inter‑party enmity, the Court granted bail subject to a bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties and compliance with Section 482(2) of the BNS, also requiring one bailor to be a close family member.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner pending trial in view of the alleged firearm injury, delay in filing the FIR, and the existence of inter‑party animosity.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • delay in FIR
  • injury report
  • animus
  • firearm injury
  • Section 482
  • Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73548 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-630 Year-2024 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur
                 ======================================================
                 Raja Kumar S/O Bhola Singh Residentof Village - Sarmastpur, Police Station-
                 Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur



                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar


                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Shashank Shekhar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   11-02-2026                  Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Sakra P.S. Case No. 630 of 2024, registered for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115, 118(1), 117,

                   109 and 3(5) of the BNS.

                                3. Based upon the written report, the prosecution

                   alleges that on 30.11.2024, all the FIR named accused persons,

                   including the petitioner, along with some unknown persons

                   came at the house of the informant and brutally assaulted the

                   Bindu Devi and others. It is further alleged that co-accused

                   Monu Kumar @ Chhotu and this petitioner also shot fire due to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73548 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                            2/4




          which Bindu Devi sustained a bullet injury on her thigh. This

          occurrence was follow up to an earlier incidence on 15 th

          November, 2024, where the petitioner along with others were

          allegedly set ablaze the house of Bisheshwar Singh, in order to

          evict them from their residence. This time also they set ablaze

          the house of the informant by sprinkling patrol.

                       4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that

          allegedly the petitioner is said to have fired along with one

          Manmohan Thakur over the thigh of Bindu Devi but the injury

          report of the injured reflects no such corroborative injury.

          Referring to the injury report, it is submitted that neither there is

          charring nor tattooing. The doctor does not suggest the injury

          caused by firearm; all the more the injury is said to be simple in

          nature. The false implication of the petitioner cannot be ruled

          out in view of the ongoing animosity; earlier the father of the

          informant as well as the wife of the informant have also

          instituted two cases against the petitioner; however the

          petitioner is on bail in both the cases. Besides the aforesaid

          cases, the petitioner is also accused in connection with the

          offences under Excise Act; however he is on bail in the said

          case. It is lastly contended that there is counter version of the

          present case being Sakra P.S. Case No. 629 of 2024 instituted by
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73548 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                            3/4




          Nilam Devi, the mother of the present petitioner, against the

          informant and others, which is on earlier point of time. The

          delay in lodging of the FIR also makes the case fatal to the

          prosecution, is the contention of the learned Advocate for the

          petitioner.

                        5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State

          vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the

          besides three criminal antecedent, there is specific accusation

          against the petitioner of causing firearm injury and there is

          corresponding injury, as is evidence from the injury report.

                        6. Having considered the submissions advanced by

          the learned Advocates for the respective parties and taking note

          of the delay in lodging of the FIR, coupled with the injury

          report, which does not prima facie suggest firearm injury as well

          as the factum of case and counter case and the previous enmity

          between the parties, let the petitioner abovenamed be released

          on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court

          below within a period of four weeks from the date of

          receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail

          bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional

          Chief Judicial Magistrate-15, Muzaffarpur in connection with
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73548 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                                       4/4




                     Sakra P.S. Case No. 630 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid

                     down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha

                     Sanhita, 2023, with the further condition that one of the bailors

                     shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.



                                                 (Harish Kumar, J)
Anjani/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.