Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed the petition.

Summary

Nitish Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail petition. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted the request to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7363 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-274 Year-2025 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali
                  ======================================================
                  Nitish Kumar, Son of Lagandeo @ Dhoorkheli Rai Resident of Village-
                  Jahangirpur Sukumarpur, P.S.- Rustampur, District- Vaishali

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Ms.Pooja Arya
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Rana Randhir Singh
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    17-02-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks

                    permission to withdraw the instant anticipatory bail application

                    as petitioner, during pendency of the same, was arrested.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.