Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Khushi Sharma @ Khushi Kumari @ Khushi Kumari SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner with specified conditions.

Summary

Khushi Sharma applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a kidnapping case (Sections 137(2) and 96 of the B.N.S.) where the victim's daughter was allegedly abducted. The FIR alleges a conspiracy involving several accused, but the petitioner’s alleged role was limited to calling the victim through her brother. The victim’s statement under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS does not mention any sexual assault, and she refused a medical examination. The petitioner has no prior criminal record and is a young friend of the victim. Considering that the main thrust of the accusation is against other co‑accused and the petitioner’s involvement is peripheral, the court granted anticipatory bail on condition of a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, surrender within four weeks, and compliance with Sections 438(2) Cr.P.C. and 482(2) B.N.S.S.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner accused of conspiracy in a kidnapping case
  • Whether the petitioner poses a flight risk or threat to the investigation

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • kidnapping
  • conspiracy
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • bail bond
  • sureties
  • no criminal antecedent
  • love affair

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7442 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2025 Thana- NOWKOTHI GARHPURA District-
                                                         Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Khushi Sharma @ Khushi Kumari @ Khushi Kumari Sharma D/o Binay
                 Sharma @ Binay Kumar Sharma R/o Village- Purvi Dafarpur, P.S- Nawkothi,
                 Dist- Begusarai.
                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                               Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr.Shubhesh Pandey
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr.Rina Sinha
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 137(2), 96

                   of the B.N.S.

                                3. Allegation in the First Information Report is that

                   the accused persons including the petitioner were involved in

                   kidnapping the daughter of the informant from her house in

                   pursuance of conspiracy.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   present case arises out of a love affair between the victim and

                   one Suraj Kumar @ Mixa and the allegation against the present

                   petitioner is confined to the fact that she had called the victim to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7442 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                            2/3




          her house through her brother. From perusal of the bail rejection

          order discussing the statements of the victim under Section 180

          and 183 of the BNSS also would go to show that the allegations

          against the present petitioner is confined to an angle of

          conspiracy, however, thrust of the allegation is against other co-

          accused persons who had taken her away. However, the victim

          has not mentioned any sexual assault or physical intercourse in

          her statement and has rather refused to undergo a medical

          examination.

                       5.    Learned APP for the State has opposed the

          application for anticipatory bail.

                            6. Taking into consideration the facts and

          circumstances and also considering the fact that the thrust of the

          allegation is upon other co-accused persons and the allegations

          against the present petitioner who is a young girl and also friend

          of the victim is confined to a conspiracy angle, let the above

          named petitioner, who has no criminal antecedent, in the event

          of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within

          a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with

          two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

          learned court below where the case is pending/successor court
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7442 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                         3/3




                       in connection with Nawkothi P.S. Case No. 178 of 2025, subject

                       to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the

                       Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.



                                                 (Soni Shrivastava, J)
devendra/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.