Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Satish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner.

Summary

Satish Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Section 140(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleged to involve the abduction of the informant's husband. The prosecution contended that Kumar and co‑accused fled when police raided the location. The petitioner claimed innocence, alleging the case was fabricated due to a loan dispute between the informant's husband and a third party, and pointed out that a co‑accused had already been granted bail. The State opposed the bail application. After considering the submissions and the circumstances, the Court ordered the release of the petitioner on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. The order was pronounced by Justice Khatim Reza.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner accused under Section 140(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • kidnapping
  • false accusation
  • loan dispute
  • Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7511 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-269 Year-2025 Thana- PARSABAZAR District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Satish Kumar, Son of Binod Singh @ Vinod Singh, Resident of Village-
                 Nadpura, P.S.- Dhanarua, District- Patna
                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                               ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Prem Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Parsa

                   Bazar P.S. Case No. 269 of 2025 dated 26.06.2025 instituted for

                   the offence punishable under Sections 140(2) of the Bhartiya

                   Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the husband of the

                   informant was abducted by the petitioner and when the police

                   conducted raid at the place where the husband of the informant

                   was found, the petitioner and co-accused were apprehended while

                   trying to run away on seeing the police party.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is

                   friendship between husband of the informant and the petitioner
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7511 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                      2/2




                    and both of them always used to visit the house of each other. The

                    informant’s husband demanded Rs. 50,000/- as loan from one

                    Chandan Kumar and he gave the aforesaid amount to the

                    informant’s husband and when Chandan Kumar demanded his

                    loan amount from the informant’s husband, then the informant’s

                    husband has lodged this false and fabricated case. It is further

                    submitted that co-accused Chandan Kumar has been granted bail

                    vide order dated 21.01.2026 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this

                    Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 75773 of 2025. Lastly, it has

                    been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 24.06.2025

                    having one criminal case against him. Charge-sheet has been

                    submitted in the case.

                                  5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the

                    petitioner.

                                  6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the

                    case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the

                    petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

                    10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

                    to the satisfaction of the learned J. M. 1 st Class, Patna in Parsa

                    Bazar P.S. Case No. 269 of 2025.


                                                                        (Khatim Reza, J)

premchand/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.