Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Khushboo Kumari @ Khusboo Devi @ Khushboo DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, finding no direct allegation against her and deeming the period of custody sufficient ground for release.

Summary

The petitioner, Khushboo Kumari, sought bail in a case (Charka Pathar P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025) where she was accused, along with family members, of torturing and killing a woman over a dowry demand, alleged under Sections 61(2), 80(2), 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged a dowry‑related murder, while the petitioner contended she was falsely implicated, being the sister‑in‑law of the deceased with no direct involvement or criminal antecedent. Her counsel argued that no specific overt act was attributed to her and that she had already been in custody since 7 July 2025. The State opposed bail. Considering the absence of a direct allegation against her and the length of her custody, the Court inclined to grant bail, ordering release upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties of equal amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of the alleged dowry‑related murder charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • dowry death
  • false implication
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • criminal procedure
  • family dispute

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76263 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2025 Thana- Charkapathar District- Jamui
                 ======================================================
                 Khushboo Kumari @ Khusboo Devi @ Khushboo Devi Wife of Ramchandra
                 Pramar (D/o Ranveer Singh) Resident of Gram Maheshwari, Post-
                 Maheshwari, P.S.- Sono, Tola- Mahesri Gadi, District- Jamui, Bihar, presently
                 residing at village- Mahadv Simariya, P.S.- Sikandara, District- Jamui, Bihar

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Ansh Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   04-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                               2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Charka

                   Pathar P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025 instituted for the offences under

                   Sections 61(2), 80(2), 238, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

                   2023.

                               3. Prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner

                   alongwith the family members tortured and killed the deceased

                   for the non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

                   petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.

                   Petitioner is the sister-in-law (nanad) of the deceased. Learned
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76263 of 2025(4) dt.04-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     counsel for the petitioner submitted that general and omnibus

                     allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific

                     overt act is alleged against the petitioner. Learned counsel

                     further submitted that petitioner is separate in mess and business

                     and has got no concern in the family affairs of the deceased and

                     her husband. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner

                     that the petitioner is in custody since 07.07.2025 and has no

                     criminal antecedent.

                                 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

                     opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                                  6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                     of the case, there being no direct allegation against the petitioner

                     as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this

                     Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                                  7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

                     bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

                     below/concerned Court in connection with Charka Pathar P.S.

                     Case No. 72 of 2025.



                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Alok Verma/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.