Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mithun Giri @ Mithun Kumar GiriversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Mithun Giri was named in an FIR (Benipatti Police Station Case No. 246 of 2024) for the murder of the informant's father. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, arguing that he was implicated only on suspicion, has no criminal antecedent, and that eyewitnesses identified only Bobby Mishra and Happy Mishra at the scene, one of whom was armed. The informant opposed bail, claiming the petitioner conspired in the killing, citing statements in the case diary. The court examined the evidence, noted the lack of direct involvement of the petitioner, and considered the statutory provision for anticipatory bail. Concluding that the petitioner was merely a suspect, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner who is named in the FIR solely on suspicion
  • Whether the material on record justifies denial of bail under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • suspicion
  • murder
  • FIR
  • Section 482
  • Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76373 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-246 Year-2024 Thana- BENIPATTI District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Mithun Giri @ Mithun Kumar Giri Son of Ram Pravesh Giri R/o Village-
                 Dhanauja, P.S.- Benipatti, District- Madhubani

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Ratna Priya
                 For the State            :        Mr.Ajit Kumar
                 For the informant        :        Mr. Ankit Raj
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   02-04-2026         1.   Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel

                            for the informant and learned Additional Public

                            Prosecutor for the State.

                       2.   This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out

                            of Benipatti Police Station Case No. 246 of 2024, dated

                            22.10.2024,       disclosing       offences      punishable       under

                            Sections 103(1)/61(2)/3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita,

                            2023.

                       3.   The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report

                            lodged on 22.10.2024, is that the on 20.10.2024, at about

                            9 PM, co-accused Bobby Mishra @ Vikrant Mishra came

                            near the house of the informant and started talking loudly

                            on mobile phone with one Manoj. After sometime, he
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76373 of 2025(4) dt.02-04-2026
                                            2/4




                   went away from there for smoking. On 21.10.2024, again

                   around 9 PM, co-accused Bobby Mishra called the father

                   of the informant to meet him, but his father objected.

                   Further, Manoj called the informant’s father and upon

                   which, the informant’s father met with them. After

                   sometime, the brother of the informant received

                   information that his father was lying in front of the

                   grocery shop of Raj Kumar and when the informant

                   reached there, he saw that his father was shot dead and

                   blood was oozing out.

              4.   Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner has not committed any offence in the manner

                   alleged and he has been named in the First Information

                   Report on the basis of suspicion only. In course of

                   investigation, the eye-witness, Chandrakant Jha, has told

                   that two persons were there on the motorcycle, one of

                   whom was co-accused Bobby Mishra, having a gun in his

                   waist, and another one was Happy Mishra, and this

                   witness saw them fleeing away from the place of

                   occurrence.

              5.   On the other hand, learned Counsel for the informant

                   vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76373 of 2025(4) dt.02-04-2026
                                            3/4




                   submits that in the First Information Report itself, strong

                   belief has been shown by the informant that the petitioner,

                   along with other accused persons, in conspiracy with each

                   other, has killed the father of the informant. During

                   course of investigation, witness Prabhu Narayan Mishra,

                   in paragraph 20 of the case diary, has stated that the

                   petitioner, along with others, has conspired to kill the

                   father of the informant.

              6.   Regards being had to the submissions advanced on behalf

                   of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that

                   the petitioner has been made accused on the basis of

                   suspicion only, he is having no criminal antecedent and at

                   the place of occurrence, only two persons, Bobby Mishra

                   and Happy Mishra, were seen by the eye-witness, one of

                   whom was carrying gun in his waist, I am inclined to

                   grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail.

              7. This application is, accordingly, allowed.

              8.   Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest

                   or surrender before the Court below within a period of

                   four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing

                   bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties

                   of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76373 of 2025(4) dt.02-04-2026
                                                        4/4




                              Additional       Chief      Judicial     Magistrate-I,    Benipatti,

                              Madhubani, in connection with Benipatti Police Station

                              Case No. 246 of 2024, subject to the condition laid down

                              under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

                              Sanhita, 2023.



                                                                           (Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)
Prabhakar Anand/-

U √     T   √


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.