Patna High Court

Ram Kishor Chaudhary @ Kishor ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 23 February 2026
Disposal: DISPOSED
Bench: SATYAVRAT VERMA

Holding

The court corrected the appearance record to reflect Mr. Manas Rajdeep as the petitioner’s counsel, leaving the rest of the order unchanged.

Summary

The petitioner, Ram Kishor Chaudhary, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition against the State of Bihar. During the hearing, it was observed that the appearance record incorrectly listed the petitioner's counsel as Mr. Rajdeo and Mr. Anil Kumar instead of the actual counsel, Mr. Manas Rajdeep. The petitioner’s counsel submitted a request to correct this clerical error. The Hon'ble Justice Satyavrat Verma accepted the submission and recorded the correct appearance of Mr. Manas Rajdeep. The court ordered that the rest of the earlier order dated 23.02.2026 would remain unchanged, effectively amending only the appearance record.

Issues considered

Whether the appearance record can be corrected to reflect the correct name of the petitioner's counsel?

Subjects

court procedure
appearance correction
counsel identification
criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7664 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2015 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP.
                                                       District- Patna
                  ======================================================
                  Ram Kishor Chaudhary @ Kishor Chaudhary S/o- Late Raktu Chaudhary
                  Village- Aashopur, P.S- Danapur, Dist- Patna
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                  The State of Bihar
                                                                ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :    Mr. Manas Rajdeep, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :    Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 2, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    26-02-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

                    learned APP for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                    in the appearance, the name of the learned counsel for the

                    petitioner has been typed as Mr. Rajdeo and Mr. Anil Kumar

                    when it ought to have been Manas Rajdeep who had argued the

                    case.

                                 3. In view of the submission made by the learned

                    counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, in the order dated

                    23.02.2026, the appearance of Mr. Manas Rajdeep is recorded.

                                 4. Rest of the order shall remain the same.



                                                      (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

Manas Rajdeep