Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet RoyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioners subject to a bond and specific conditions.

Summary

The petitioners, Ranjeet Kumar and Rajeev Kumar, were charged under IPC sections 147, 149, 341, 307, 34 and Arms Act section 27 for allegedly firing on an informant and his nephew, causing injuries to both. An earlier application for anticipatory bail had been rejected by a coordinate bench of the same court. The petitioners contended that they were falsely implicated, that no incriminating material was found on them, and that they had no prior criminal record. The State opposed the bail application. Considering the circumstances, the court decided to grant bail, directing the petitioners to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 15,000 each with two sureties and imposing conditions regarding family surety and regular appearance in court.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused despite the seriousness of the offences and the earlier rejection of anticipatory bail
  • Whether the conditions imposed by the court are sufficient to ensure the petitioners' attendance and prevent tampering with evidence

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • anticipatory bail
  • IPC
  • Arms Act
  • criminal procedure
  • injury
  • court conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77181 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2024 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Roy S/O Bijendra Roy R/O Village-
                  Nirbullahchak, P.S. Pachrukhiya, Gaurichak, District- Patna.
           2.    Rajeev Kumar @ Rajeev Roy S/O Vijay Roy R/O Village- Nirbullahchak,
                 P.S. Pachrukhiya, Gaurichak, District- Patna.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Patanjali Rishi, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   03-02-2026                       Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned

                   APP for the State and perused the case diary.

                                2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with

                   Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 09 of 2024, instituted for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 307, 34 of the Indian

                   Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

                                3. Earlier, anticipatory bail of these petitioners have

                   been rejected by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order

                   dated 10.12.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 81527 of 2024.

                                4. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioners

                   fired upon the informant and his nephew due to which the

                   informant sustained injury on his left leg and his nephew
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77181 of 2025(3) dt.03-02-2026
                                            2/3




          sustained injury on his right leg.

                       5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

          petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the

          present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No

          incriminating material have been recovered from the conscious

          possession of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners

          also submitted that the allegation levelled against the petitioners

          are false and baseless. It is further submitted that the injury

          sustained by the alleged injured persons are simple in nature and

          on non-vital parts of the body. The petitioners are in custody

          since 05.06.2025 and have got no criminal antecedent.

                       6. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

                       7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case and taking into account the period of custody

          undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail

          to the petitioners.

                       8. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with

          two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

          below/concerned Court in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case

          No. 09 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77181 of 2025(3) dt.03-02-2026
                                                         3/3




                                    (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of

                       the family of the petitioners.

                                    (II) The petitioners shall appear on each and every

                       date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on

                       two consecutive dates, the prosecution will have liberty to move

                       for cancellation of bail.



                                                                   (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Rajorshi/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.