Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Devendra SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to bail bond and surety conditions and compliance with Section 482(2).

Summary

The petitioners, Devendra Sharma and Savita Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Barhariya P.S. Case No.275 of 2025) filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners assaulted an informant with a bamboo stick and a knife during a land dispute. The petitioners contended they were falsely implicated, had clean antecedents, and were willing to cooperate with the investigation. The State opposed the bail application. After considering the submissions, the Court granted anticipatory bail, directing the petitioners to furnish bail bonds of Rs 10,000 each with two sureties, provided they are arrested or surrender within six weeks, and subject to the conditions of Section 482(2) of the Act.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in view of the alleged offences.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • criminal procedure
  • false implication
  • land dispute
  • assault
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77208 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-275 Year-2025 Thana- BARHARIA District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
           1.     Devendra Sharma S/o Ram Sagar Sharma, Resident of Vill.- Sundarpur,
                  P.S.- Barhariya, Dist.- Siwan.
           2.     Savita Devi W/o Ram Sagar Sharma, Resident of Vill.- Sundarpur, P.S.-
                  Barhariya, Dist.- Siwan.
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                               Versus
                 The State of Bihar.                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Ms. Kumari Anupam, Advocate.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   11-02-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection

                   with Barhariya P.S. Case No.275 of 2025 instituted under

                   Sections 126(2), 115(1), 118(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the

                   B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, it is stated by the

                   informant that his pattidar who is petitioner no.1 and his

                   mother, petitioner no.2 came at his door and started abusing due

                   to previous dispute. When he raised objection, petitioner no.1

                   assaulted him on his head with bamboo, thereafter petitioner

                   no.2 attacked with knife on him.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77208 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                                          2/2




                        case due to previous enmity. He further submits that the injury

                        to the injured is simple in nature. He also submits that both the

                        parties are pattidar and there is land dispute between them.

                        Learned counsel submits that there is no specific allegation

                        against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have

                        got clean antecedent and they undertake to cooperate in the

                        investigation and trial of the case.

                                     5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

                        anticipatory bail.

                                     6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

                        and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event

                        of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks

                        from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing

                        bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two

                        sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the

                        learned A.C.J.M.-III, Siwan in connection with Barhariya P.S.

                        Case No.275 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in

                        Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

                        2023.



                                                (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.