Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Amar Deep Sharma @ Lalu SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner subject to the stipulated conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Amar Deep Sharma, was arrested in connection with a NDND‑PS case alleging possession of 220 bottles of Onerex cough syrup containing codeine. He contended that the syrup is exempt under Notification S.O. 826(E) 1985 because its codeine concentration (0.2%) is below the 2.5% threshold for manufactured drugs, and that the contraband was recovered from a flat not his residence. The State opposed bail, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Hira Singh v. Union of India, which treats any non‑toxic material mixed with a contraband as part of the contraband and deems the quantity commercial. The Court examined Section 2(d) of the NDPS Act and the scope of the notification, concluding that the exemption argument was not decisive for bail. Accordingly, the Court granted regular bail on a cash bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of personal appearance and a family surety.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Onerex cough syrup falls within the exemption provided by Notification S.O. 826(E) 1985 under the NDPS Act.
  • Whether the quantity recovered constitutes a commercial quantity rendering bail inappropriate.
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite the allegations under Sections 8(C), 29, 35 and 21(C) of the NDPS Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • NDPS Act
  • bail
  • codeine
  • cough syrup
  • exemption
  • commercial quantity
  • Section 2(d)
  • Notification S.O. 826(E)
  • contraband

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77236 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2025 Thana- DARBHANGA District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Amar Deep Sharma @ Lalu Sharma S/o Late Jai Prakash Thakur R/o Mohalla
                 - Ratnopatti, P.S - Town, District - Darbhanga

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mrs. Mili Kumari
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   21-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Darbhanga Town P.S.

                   Case No. 136 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable

                   under Sections 8(C), 29, 35 and 21(C) of the NDPS Act.

                                3. As per the allegation made in the F.I.R., there is

                   recovery of 220 bottles of Onerex Cough Syrup (100 ml), and

                   other contraband materials which is the subject matter of the

                   present case.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the

                   present case. It is contended that no incriminating article has

                   been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner;
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77236 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026
                                            2/4




          the material was allegedly recovered from a semi-constructed

          two-room flat, which is not the residential house of the

          petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 28.07.2025 and a

          statement has been made in para 3 of the bail petition that

          petitioner has clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also

          submitted that Under Notification No. S.O. 826(E) dated

          14.11.1985 under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

          Substances Act and Rules, 1985 that preparations are exempted

          as manufactured drugs provided the preparations contained the

          narcotic drugs to the extent permitted in respect of codeine

          under Entry No. 35. It is stated that codeine and ethyle

          morphine and their salts including dionine all dilutions and

          preparations are considered to be manufactured drugs except

          those which are compounded with one or more other ingredients

          and containing not more than 100 miligrams of the drugs per

          doses unit and with a concentration of not more than 2.5 % in

          undivided preparations and which have been established in

          therapeutic practice.

                       6. In this case, Onerex cough syrup has been

          recovered and the concentration of the codeine in this drug is

          approximately 0.2% which is less than 2.5% as provided in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77236 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026
                                            3/4




          above notification.

                       7. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently

          opposed the application for bail and has submitted that in the case of

          Hira Singh and Anr. V. Union of India and Anr., the Hon’ble

          Supreme Court has held that entire non-toxic material which is mixed

          with the contraband will be considered as the contraband and as such,

          the quantity which has been recovered from the possession of this

          petitioner is commercial quantity.

                       8. In this regard, it is worth mentioning that in view of

          Section 2(d) of the N.D.P.S. Act, the drug itself is not narcotic

          drug then there is no jurisdictional basis for the case and the

          Court would not have a reason to go into the question of

          quantities. The Central Government has power to issue

          notification time to time.

                       9. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and considering

          the period under custody, let the petitioner, above named, be

          released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-

          I/Special Judge, NDPS, Darbhanga in connection with

          Darbhanga Town P.S. Case No. 136 of 2025 subject to the

          following conditions :-

                       (i). Petitioner will remain physically present in trial on
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77236 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026
                                                       4/4




                     each and every date till the disposal of the case failing which, on

                     two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of

                     the petitioner may be cancelled by the Trial Court.

                                  (ii). One of the bailor shall be his family member.



                                                (S. B. Pd. Singh, J)


Ankit Kumar/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.