Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dinesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court held that, given the petitioner’s clean record and the simple nature of the injuries, bail should be granted upon furnishing a bond and sureties.

Summary

Dinesh Kumar was arrested in connection with an assault allegedly committed with an axe, resulting in minor injuries to the informant’s husband. The prosecution alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023, while the petitioner claimed innocence, no prior criminal record, and that the injuries were simple and caused by a blunt object. The petitioner applied for bail, arguing false implication and presenting a medical report supporting the minor nature of the injuries. The State opposed the bail on the seriousness of the charges. After hearing both sides, the court considered the lack of antecedents and the nature of the injuries and decided to grant bail on condition of a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties. The order directs the petitioner to appear before the SDJM, Samastipur, upon furnishing the bail bond.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the multiple serious offences alleged under the B.N.S., 2023

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S., 2023 — s. 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 303(2), 308(3), 3(5), 351(2), 352

Subjects

  • bail
  • assault
  • criminal procedure
  • injury report
  • surety bond
  • B.N.S. 2023

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7727 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2025 Thana- NATIONAL HIGHWAY District-
                                                       Samastipur
                 ======================================================
                 Dinesh Kumar S/O Nathuni Sah R/O vill.- Mohiuddinpur, P.S.- Bangra, Dist.-
                 Samastipur
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with N.H. Bangra P.S. Case No. 122 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1),

                   118(1), 303(2), 308(3), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.,

                   2023.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the

                   petitioner has assaulted with an axe on the head of the

                   informant’s husband.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. He also submits that other allegations are against other
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7727 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     accused persons, and from perusal of the injury report, which is

                     annexed at Annexure-P/2, it will transpire that the husband of

                     the informant has received two injuries: (i) incised wound over

                     the frontal part of the scalp measuring 1/2”x1/4”x1/3” and (ii)

                     pain over the lower back. He further submits that the doctor has

                     opined that the nature of the injury is simple, caused by a hard

                     and blunt substance. Moreover, a statement has been made in

                     para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent

                     and he is languishing in judicial custody since 26.10.2025.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                     petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     S.D.J.M., Samastipur in connection with N.H. Bangra P.S. Case

                     No. 122 of 2025.


                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.