Patna High Court
Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- R P MISHRA
Holding
The court held that, given the lack of direct evidence and the petitioner’s clean record, bail should be granted subject to standard conditions.
Summary
The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, was arrested as a driver when 160 litres of illicit country-made liquor were seized from his vehicle. He claimed innocence, asserting no knowledge of the contraband and no incriminating material was found in his possession. The petitioner had been in custody since 5 December 2025 and had no prior criminal record, while the prosecution argued the recovery of liquor under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The State opposed bail, but the court noted the lack of direct evidence against the petitioner and the non‑compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Consequently, the court granted bail on a bond of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions on appearance, non‑tampering with evidence, and non‑intimidation of witnesses.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the accused driver in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- Whether the requirements of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, have been complied with
- Whether the absence of incriminating material in the accused's possession justifies bail
Legislation cited
Subjects
- bail
- excise
- illicit liquor
- driver
- Section 30
- Section 32
- Section 103
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7731 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1040 Year-2025 Thana- EXCISE DANAPUR District- Patna
======================================================
Raushan Kumar S/O Late Binod Rai R/o- Village Dumariya, Ward no 01, P.s.-
Bihta, Dist.- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ghanshyam Tiwary, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ramesh Chandra, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
2 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Spl.
Case No. 2415 of 2025, arising out of Danapur Excise P.S. Case
No. 1040 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under
Sections 30(a) and 32(3)of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 160
liters of country made liquor was recovered from Tampoo.
Petitioner was arrested on the spot.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the
present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from
the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got
no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7731 of 2026(2) dt.10-02-2026
2/3
further submitted that the petitioner is driver of the vehicle and
he has no knowledge regarding the goods loaded in the vehicle.
The petitioner is in custody since 05.12.2025 and has got no
criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of
the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed
the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances
of the case and the period of custody undergone by the
petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing
bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court
below/concerned Court in connection with Spl. Case No. 2415
of 2025, arising out of Danapur Excise P.S. Case No. 1040 of
2025, subject to the following conditions:
(I) One of the bailors shall be the petitioner’s own or
close member.
(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date
fixed during the trial and shall not remain absent on two
consecutive dates without sufficient cause.
(III) The petitioner shall not tamper with the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7731 of 2026(2) dt.10-02-2026
3/3
prosecution evidence or influence/intimidate any witness during
the course of trial.
In case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions,
the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the
petitioner.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
manish/-
U T
Checking your session…