Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sashi Ranjan Morya @ Shashi Kant MoryaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Bail was denied as there was no new ground and the trial was at an advanced stage.

Summary

The petitioner, Sashi Ranjan Morya, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 331(3), 309(6) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. This was his second bail application after the High Court had earlier rejected his request on 24.03.2025. The trial court had framed charges on 28.04.2025 and examined seven of eight witnesses, with the trial expected to conclude within four months. The petitioner argued that he had been in judicial custody since 12.09.2024 without any criminal antecedent, while the State opposed bail. The Court found no new ground for granting bail and noted that the trial was at an advanced stage, consequently rejecting the bail petition and directing lower authorities to expedite the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in view of the advanced stage of trial and the nature of offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
  • Whether any new ground exists to justify a fresh bail order

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • judicial custody
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • trial stage
  • criminal procedure
  • Buxar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77558 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-283 Year-2024 Thana- BUXAR MUFFSIL District- Buxar
                 ======================================================
                 Sashi Ranjan Morya @ Shashi Kant Morya S/O Dinesh Singh R/O Village-
                 Kailakh, P.S- Dhansoi, Distt.- Buxar.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   09-01-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                           2.      The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Buxar

                   (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 283 of 2024 instituted for the offences

                   under Sections 103(1), 331(3), 309(6) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya

                   Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                           3.      This is the second attempt of the petitioner for bail.

                   The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail

                   which was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated

                   24.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 88136 of 2024 considering

                   the ample material against the petitioner to show his

                   involvement in the alleged occurrence as also nature and gravity

                   of the offence.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77558 of 2025(3) dt.09-01-2026
                                            2/3




                  4.      In compliance of the order dated 12.11.2025, a

          report dated 15.11.2025 with regard to the present stage of trial

          has been received. From perusal of the aforesaid report, it

          appears that charge has already been framed against the

          petitioner on 28.04.2025 and out of eight witnesses, seven

          witnesses have been examined. It is further reported that only

          one witness i.e. doctor has not been examined for which notice

          has been issued and the trial is likely to be concluded within a

          period of four months.

                  5.      Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 12.09.2024

          without any rhymes or reason and has got no criminal

          antecedent.

                  6.      Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                  7.      There is no new ground to consider the bail petition

          of the petitioner. From the aforesaid report, it appears that the

          trial is going on and is at an advance stage.

                   8.     In view of the above, the prayer for bail of the

          petitioner is again rejected with a direction to the court below to

          expedite the trial.

                   9. The District Magistrate, Buxar and the Superintendent
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77558 of 2025(3) dt.09-01-2026
                                                         3/3




                       of Police, Buxar are also directed to take necessary steps to

                       produce the witness on the date fixed in the Trial Court so that

                       the trial could be concluded within the stipulated period.

                                10. Let this order be communicated to the District

                       Magistrate, Buxar and the Superintendent of Police, Buxar.



                                                                   (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Rajorshi/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.