Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jagdish PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The court denied anticipatory bail to Jagdish Prasad but granted it to the guarantors Soni Patel and Ravi Patel.

Summary

The petitioners Jagdish Prasad, Soni Patel and Ravi Patel were implicated in an FIR under Sections 420, 409 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged defalcation of a Rs.300 lakh loan granted by Bank of Baroda. The bank alleged that the loan amount was embezzled through asset stripping and that the guarantors were complicit. The petitioners sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the matter is essentially a civil dispute suitable for the Debt Recovery Tribunal. The court examined the FIR and found prima facie evidence of fraud, noting the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent. Consequently, the court refused anticipatory bail to Jagdish Prasad but granted it to the guarantors Soni Patel and Ravi Patel, subject to bail conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to Jagdish Prasad in view of the alleged offences under IPC Sections 420, 409 and 120(B).
  • Whether the guarantors Soni Patel and Ravi Patel are entitled to anticipatory bail despite being named in the FIR.
  • Whether the FIR is maintainable given that the dispute pertains to a loan default and could be addressed before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • loan fraud
  • bank fraud
  • IPC 420
  • IPC 409
  • IPC 120B
  • guarantor
  • NPA
  • Debt Recovery Tribunal
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                            CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77888 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-282 Year-2024 Thana- SHRIKRISHNAPURI District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Jagdish Prasad Son of Late Gokul Prasad Resident of Block-C, Flat No. 304,
                 Surya Disha Compound, Digha Ashiana Road, P.S.- Rajeev Nagar, District-
                 Patna, PIN Code- 800001

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Nalin Kumar, Deputy General Manager, Area Head, Bank of Baroda First
                 Floor, Hotel Satkar Premises, Dak Bunglow Chauraha, Frazer Road, Patna -
                 800001, P.S.- Kotwali, Patna

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                                                        with
                            CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 79744 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-282 Year-2024 Thana- SHRIKRISHNAPURI District- Patna
                 ======================================================
           1.     Soni Patel W/o Ravi Patel R/o - Block C, Flat No. 304, Surya Disha
                  Compound, Digha Ashiana Road, P.S - Rajeev Nagar, District - Patna, Pin -
                  800001
           2.    Ravi Patel S/o Jagdish Prasad R/o - Block C, Flat No. 304, Surya Disha
                 Compound, Digha Ashiana Road, P.S - Rajeev Nagar, District - Patna, Pin -
                 800001

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 77888 of 2025)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Rounak Sinha, Advocate
                                            Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, A.P.P.

                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 79744 of 2025)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Rounak Sinha, Advocate
                                            Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate
                 For the Bank             : Mr. Vivek Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   04-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the parties concerned.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77888 of 2025(4) dt.04-05-2026
                                            2/5




                       2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection

          with S.K. Puri P.S. case no. 282 of 2024, registered for the

          offences punishable under Sections 420, 409 and 120(B) of the

          Indian Penal Code.

                       3. The prosecution story in brief is that the informant

          is the Regional head of Bank of Baroda. The petitioner Jagdish

          Patel is the proprietor of M/s Tirupati Refrigeration. The firm is

          wholeseller/distributor of Voltas- Tata products in Bihar. The

          firm got approval of cash credit facilities of Rs.300 lakhs (3

          crores) on 16.10.2023. On various dates, officials of Branch

          made inspections and found sufficient stock in the godown. On

          29.11.2023 the firm was audited and nothing adverse was found.

          When on 04.04.2024, the Branch officials inspected the

          godown, they found minimum stock and no inventory in the

          godown. Delay was found in payment of installment within 5

          months of approval of loans. Since interest was not paid and

          turnover was not sufficient, the credit facilities was converted

          into NPA on 14.06.2024. The proprietor, Jagdish Prasad along

          with the two guarantors, namely Soni Patel and Ravi Patel, have

          defalcated the loan amount in conspiracy with each other.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

          petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case as the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77888 of 2025(4) dt.04-05-2026
                                            3/5




          present case is of civil nature and it relates to a failed business

          run by the proprietor, Jagdish Prasad. The other two co-accused

          are guarantors. He further submits that this is a case of loan

          default, hence Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) is it’s appropriate

          forum. The present FIR is not maintainable as the respondent

          bank has already proceeded by filing case no. OA/411/2024,

          before the DRT, Patna.

                       5. Learned counsel further submits that the other two

          co-accused are guarantors and merely for the said reason they

          have been roped into this case.

                       6. On the other hand learned counsel appearing on

          behalf of informant Bank as well as learned APP for the state

          vehemently opposed the prayer of Anticipatory bail and submits

          that the petitioners have embezzled the sanctioned loan amount

          in calculative manner within five months from the date of loan

          approval and have defrauded a huge amount of the Bank. The

          petitioners have committed a serious offence and proper

          investigation is required to be done in the present case.

          Therefore, custodial interrogation may be required.

                       7. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and

          gone through the material available on record.

                       8. From perusal of the FIR, it appears that within 5
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77888 of 2025(4) dt.04-05-2026
                                            4/5




          months of the disbursement of the sanctioned loan amount the

          petitioner defaulted in the payment of the interest and

          installments to the bank. The bank officials inspected the stocks

          on 04.04.2024 and found that all the stocks were removed

          without any invoice. The petitioner has not brought any invoice,

          GST bills, vouchers on record. Prima facie, it appears that

          petitioner had intention to defraud the bank from very inception

          and orchestrated it by asset stripping.

                       9. Considering the gravity of offence and nature of

          allegation and the fact that the petitioner is proprietor and

          borrower of the firm and having one criminal antecedent of

          similar nature, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to

          Jagdish Prasad (petitioner in Cr.Misc.77888 of 2025).

                       10. This bail application is, accordingly, rejected with

          respect to Jagdish Prasad.

                       11. In so far petitioner no. 1 and 2 in Cr. Misc. No.

          79744 of 2025, namely, Soni Patel and Ravi Patel are

          concerned, they are guarantors to the loan disbursed, I am

          inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to petitioners,

          namely, Soni Patel and Ravi Patel.

                       12. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed with

          respect to petitioner no. 1 and 2 in Cr. Misc. No. 79744 of
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77888 of 2025(4) dt.04-05-2026
                                                       5/5




                     2025, namely, Soni Patel and Ravi Patel only.

                                  13. Let the petitioners, namely, Soni Patel and Ravi

                     Patel, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court

                     below within four weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

                     like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional

                     Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with S.K. Puri Police

                     Station Case No. 282 of 2024, subject to the condition laid

                     down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

                     Sanhita.



                                              (Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
Siwani/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.