Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bali Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

Holding

A petition is dismissed for non-prosecution if the petitioner does not appear despite repeated calls.

Summary

Bali Kumar Yadav filed a petition in the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and a Mining Inspector. The petitioner failed to appear before the court despite repeated notices. The State's Additional Public Prosecutor was present. The presiding judge noted the petitioner's non-appearance and held that the petition could not proceed. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. No substantive merits of the case were examined.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear before the court after being duly notified?

Subjects

  • petition dismissal
  • non-prosecution
  • court appearance
  • procedural default
  • high court

Judgment

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77900 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2025 Thana- RISIYAP District- Aurangabad
                    ======================================================
                    Bali Kumar Yadav S/O Santosh Yadav @ Santoshi Yadav R/O Village-
                    Pindarkum, P.S.- Marnagoliya, Distt.- Latehar, Jharkhand

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
               1.   The State of Bihar
               2.   The Mining Inspector P.S.- Risiup, Dist.- Auranhgabad, Bihar

                                                           ... ... Opposite Party/s
                    ======================================================
                    Appearance :
                    For the Petitioner/s     :       None
                    For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Choubey Jawahar
                    ======================================================
                    CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                          ORAL ORDER

3    16-02-2026                    1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on

                      repeated calls.

                                   2. Learned A.P.P. for the State is present.

                                   3. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed for non-

                      prosecution.


                                                 (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.