Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Narayan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to bail bond and surety conditions.

Summary

The petitioners, three brothers from Lilabigha village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Kashichak P.S. Case No.78 of 2025) involving numerous offences under the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that a co‑accused, Ravish Kumar, caused a disturbance by parking an e‑rickshaw without a number plate, playing loud music, and assaulting police after an altercation. The petitioners contended they were merely alleged members of a mob, with no specific allegations against them, and that injuries were minor. They highlighted that similarly situated co‑accused had already been granted anticipatory bail in a related matter. The State opposed the bail. The Court, considering the circumstances, ordered that if the petitioners are arrested or surrender within six weeks, they be released on bail upon furnishing a Rs 10,000 bond each with sureties, subject to Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under Section 482(2) of the BNSS in view of the allegations of mob assault on police.

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 109, 115, 121, 126, 131, 132, 190, 191, 324, 342, 351, 352, 482

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • mob assault
  • police assault
  • B.N.S. sections
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79318 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2025 Thana- KASHICHAK District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
           1.     Narayan Yadav Son of Ballabh Yadav Resident of Village - Lilabigha, P.S.-
                  Kashichak, District- Nawada.
           2.    Ishwar Yadav Son of Ballabh Yadav R/o Village - Lilabigha, P.S. -
                 Kashichak, Dist. - Nawada.
           3.     Mithilesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar Son of Ballabh Yadav R/o Village -
                  Lilabigha, P.S. - Kashichak, Dist. - Nawada.
                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                               ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Man Mohan Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   05-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection

                   with Kashichak P.S. Case No.78 of 2025 instituted under

                   Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 132, 109, 121(1), 121(2),

                   131(2), 324(4), 342(4), 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, co-accused Ravish

                   Kumar parked his toto (e-rickshaw) vehicle, without any

                   number plate, with a tape-recorder playing song in high volume

                   and when the police asked him to give way to pass, altercation

                   took place and thereafter, some villagers were called and the

                   police were assaulted.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79318 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

          petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this

          case. He further submits that the allegation against the

          petitioners is that they are only alleged to be members of the

          mob and only on the basis of suspicion, they have been

          implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that injuries

          sustained to the injured are simple in nature. He submits that

          there is no specific allegation against the petitioners. He further

          submits that similarly situated other co-accused persons,

          namely, Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Yadav, Rakesh Kumar @

          Rakesh Yadav, Santu Yadav and Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Kumar

          have already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by a

          co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 03.12.2025

          passed in Cr. Misc. No. 77986 of 2025. The petitioners

          undertake to cooperate in the trial and investigation.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

          and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event

          of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks

          from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79318 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                     sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the

                     learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VI, Nawada in

                     connection with Kashichak P.S. Case No.78 of 2025, subject to

                     the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the BNSS.



                                             (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
AjayMishra/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.