Patna High Court

Jawahar Yadav @ ChunnuversusState Of Bihar and Anr

Decided: 2 February 2026
Disposal: DISPOSED
Bench: SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA

Holding

The petition is disposed of as infructuous.

Summary

Petitioner Jawahar Yadav filed a petition in the Patna High Court challenging the cancellation of his bail bond by orders dated 14 November 2017 and 30 May 2017. The petitioner argued that the matter could be disposed of as it had become infructuous. The State, represented by an A.P.P., raised no objection to the petitioner's request. Both parties agreed that the issues were no longer live. Consequently, the Court held that the petition should be dismissed as infructuous and ordered the case disposed.

Issues considered

Whether the petition challenging the cancellation of the bail bond is maintainable given that the matter has become infructuous

Subjects

bail
bail bond cancellation
infructuous petition
criminal procedure
petition disposed

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7954 of 2018
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1323 Year-2011 Thana- NALANDA COMPLAINT CASE
                                                    District- Nalanda
                 ======================================================
                 Jawahar Yadav @ Chunnu S/o Late Rohan Yadav, R/o Village- Bari Milki
                 Tilha Par, P.S.- Rajgir, District- Nalanda.

                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Shanti Devi D/o Lalan Yadav, R/o Mohalla- Katra Par Purani Kachahari,
                 P.S.- Bihar, District- Nalanda.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :    Mr. Hansraj, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :    Smt. Sahin Begam, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   02-02-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. This petition has been filed against the order dated

                   14.11.2017 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Nalanda at

                   Biharsharif in Cr. Rev. No. 343 of 2017 as well as order dated

                   30.05.2017 passed by learned C.J.M., Nalanda in Case No.

                   1323C of 2011, whereby and whereunder the bail bond of the

                   petitioner has been cancelled.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this

                   case may be disposed as it has become infructuous.

                                4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this

                   prayer of the petitioner.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7954 of 2018(5) dt.02-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                                   5. In view of the submissions of learned counsels for

                      the parties, this case stands disposed of as it has become

                      infructuous.



                                              (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
utkarsh/-

U       T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…