Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manoj SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to petitioner 2 subject to bail bond and surety conditions.

Summary

The petitioners, three residents of Dumri Kala, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered under multiple sections of the BNS, 2023, alleging assault and related offences. Petitioners 1 and 3 withdrew their applications, while petitioner 2, Jhunu Singh, sought anticipatory bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that the allegations were false and not specific. The State opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. The court considered the petitioner's clean record and the lack of specificity in the FIR, and ordered that if arrested within six weeks, petitioner 2 be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The anticipatory bail application was therefore allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to petitioner 2 despite the FIR alleging offences under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 329(4), 333, 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 303(2), 74, 324(2) and 352 of the BNS, 2023.
  • Whether the petitioner's clean antecedent and alleged false implication justify the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

  • BNS, 2023 — s. 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 126(2), 190, 191(2), 303(2), 324(2), 329(4), 333, 352, 74
  • BNSS — s. 482(2)

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal procedure
  • false implication
  • clean antecedent
  • BNS 2023
  • Section 482 CrPC

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79586 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-239 Year-2025 Thana- MAJORGANJ District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
           1.     Manoj Singh S/O Late Devendra Singh Resident of Village- Dumri Kala,
                  P.S.- Majorganj, Dist- Sitamarhi
           2.    Jhunu Singh @ Adarsh Raj S/O Birendra Singh Resident of Village- Dumri
                 Kala, P.S.- Majorganj, Dist- Sitamarhi
           3.    Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Singh S/O Laxmi Singh @ Bindeshwar Singh
                 Resident of Village- Dumri Kala, P.S.- Majorganj, Dist- Sitamarhi

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-01-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioners, at the outset, seeks permission to withdraw the

                   anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioner no. 1

                   (Manoj Singh) and petitioner no. 3 (Sonu Kumar @ Sonu

                   Singh).

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. The petitioner no. 2 apprehends his arrest in a case

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2),

                   190, 126(2), 329(4), 333, 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 303(2), 74,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79586 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026
                                            2/3




          324(2) and 352 of the BNS, 2023.

                       5. It is next submitted that petitioner no. 2 is a person

          with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that accused

          persons including the petitioner came to her house by a car and

          on orders of Kanhaiya, accused Sonu assaulted her husband by

          lathi on head and other parts of the body causing injury on jaw

          and swelling on head, further Kanhaiya and Monu assaulted her

          father-in-law indiscriminately by lathi causing injury on head

          and whole body while Manoj, petitioner and Birendra assaulted

          her brother-in-law by lathi causing fracture of left hand and

          swelling on hand and legs, further Mira Devi took chain of her

          son and Sonu acted inappropriately with her.

                       6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

          petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by

          the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the

          allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that petitioner

          along with Manoj and Birendra are alleged to have assaulted the

          brother-in-law of the informant causing fracture of left hand and

          swelling on hand and leg, but then the allegation of assault is

          not specific. It is also submitted that brother-in-law of the

          informant suffered grievous injury, but then the same is not on

          vital part of the body.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79586 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026
                                                        3/3




                                   7. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

                      anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

                                   8. Considering the submissions made by the learned

                      counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration that

                      petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, the petitioner no. 2

                      above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the

                      learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be

                      released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

                      10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                      amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where

                      the case is pending/successor court in connection with

                      Majorganj P.S. Case No. 239 of 2025 subject to the conditions

                      as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

                                   9. Accordingly,         the    instant   anticipatory   bail

                      application is allowed.



                                                              (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.