Patna High Court
Om KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Holding
The Court granted bail to the petitioner, directing him to furnish a bail bond with two sureties.
Summary
The petitioner, Om Kumar, was charged under Section 64 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act for allegedly having a physical relationship with a minor and attempting to kidnap her. The victim, a minor according to a school marksheet showing a birth date of 14 March 2008, gave a statement under Section 183 of the BNS claiming a consensual relationship and expressing a desire to marry the petitioner, while the medical report suggested she was between 18-20 years old with no signs of sexual assault. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the victim's minority at the time of the alleged offence. The petitioner’s counsel argued lack of force, the victim’s approaching majority, the petitioner’s clean record, and his custody since 23 September 2025. After hearing both sides, the Court found the circumstances sufficient to grant bail, directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties. The order thus enlarged the petitioner on bail pending further trial.
Issues considered
- Whether bail can be granted to an accused charged under Section 64 BNS and Section 4 POCSO when the alleged victim is a minor but claims consensual relationship
- Whether the victim's age and the absence of alleged force affect the bail decision
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita — s. 183, 64
- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act — s. 4
Subjects
- bail
- POCSO
- sexual offence
- minor
- consent
- criminal procedure
- Section 64 BNS
- Section 4 POCSO
- kidnapping
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80047 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-263 Year-2025 Thana- DHAMDAHA District- Purnia
======================================================
Om Kumar S/o Tribhuwan Yadav R/o Village - Radhanagar, P.S - Banmankhi,
District - Purnia
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Dhirendra Yadav C/o Late Yogendra Yadav R/o Village - Dhamdaha, District
- Purnia
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Shankar Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Kumar Rajdeep, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
4 01-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection
with Dhamdaha P.S. Case No.263 of 2025 registered for the
offence punishable under Section 64 of the Bharatiya Nyaya
Sanhita (BNS) and under Section 4 of the Protection of Children
from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the
petitioner who happens to be the brother-in-law of the minor
daughter of the informant has established physical relationship
with her and has also attempted to kidnap her.
4. Learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80047 of 2025(4) dt.01-04-2026
2/3
petitioner has submitted that during course of investigation the
victim has given her statement under Section 183 of the BNSS
wherein she has stated that she was in relationship with the
petitioner and has established physical relationship with the
petitioner. As she was in relationship with the petitioner, she has
not alleged any kind of use of force. She has also stated that she
wants to marry the petitioner but as the family is not ready this
case has been filed. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner
has further submitted that from perusal of the medical
examination report it will transpire that the date of birth of the
victim is assessed between 18-20 years and Doctor has opined
that there was no sign of sexual assault at the time of
examination of victim.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP
for the State. He has stated that from perusal of the marksheet of
the victim issued by Bihar School Examination Board, the date
of birth of the victim is 14.03.2008. As such, the victim was
minor at the time of occurrence.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted
that even considering the date of birth of the victim as
14.03.2008, then also she was approaching majority and she has
not alleged any kind of force was being used against her or
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80047 of 2025(4) dt.01-04-2026
3/3
against her will any sexual act was performed. Learned counsel
for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is
having no criminal antecedent and he is in judicial custody since
23.09.2025.
7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is
inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named
petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail
bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties
of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned
Additional Sessions Court-VII-cum-Special Court (POCSO),
Purnea in connection with Dhamdaha P.S. Case No.263 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
durgesh/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.