Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Aryan Kumar @ AryanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to bond and surety conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.

Summary

The petitioners, Aryan Kumar, Kari, and Golu, were accused of assaulting an informant with an iron rod and stealing his gold chain, alleged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.). They claimed the informant was a former friend who filed a false complaint after a personal dispute and asserted they have no criminal record. The State opposed their request for anticipatory bail. The Court, after considering the facts and the parties’ submissions, ordered that the petitioners be released on bail if arrested or surrendered within six weeks, subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023. The order reflects the Court’s discretion to grant bail while ensuring compliance with procedural safeguards. The petitioners were directed to cooperate with the investigation and trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in view of the allegations under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 303(2).

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita
  • assault
  • robbery
  • criminal procedure
  • Gaya district

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80253 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-341 Year-2025 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
           1.     Aryan Kumar @ Aryan S/o- Munna Mali @ Munna Kali Village- Tel Bigha
                  PS-Kotwali Dist- Gaya Ji
           2.    Kari @ Chhotu @ Chhotu Kumar S/o- Suresh Prasad R/v- Gol Bagicha
                 Gabda Ps- Kotwali Dist- Gaya Ji
           3.    Golu @ Golu Kumar @ Santosh Kumar S/o- Vinay Goshwami R/v- Tel
                 Bigha Near Nandni Travels Ps- Kotwali Dist- Gaya Ji

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection

                   with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 341 of 2025, instituted under

                   Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2) of the B.N.S.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, when the informant

                   was going to Station on his motorcycle, 10-12 persons including

                   the petitioners stopped him. Petitioners assaulted him with iron

                   rod on the head causing injury to him. They also snatched

                   golden chain from the neck of the informant.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80253 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026
                                                          2/2




                        petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this

                        case. Petitioners and informant were friends but later on due to

                        some dispute informant filed the present case and falsely

                        implicated petitioners taking advantage the fact that he had

                        fallen from his motorcycle. Injury on the injured is simple in

                        nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. They undertake

                        to co-operate in the investigation and trial.

                                     5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

                        anticipatory bail.

                                     6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

                        case and submission of learned counsel for the parties, in the

                        event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six

                        weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon

                        furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with

                        two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                        learned C.J.M., Gaya in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No.

                        341 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482

                        (2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023.



                                                (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J.)
rakhi/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.