Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Gold KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Gold Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the State opposed the withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice Satyavrat Verma granted permission to withdraw, resulting in the dismissal of the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • Criminal Procedure Code

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80536 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-668 Year-2025 Thana- SIKARPUR District- West Champaran
                  ======================================================
                  Gold Kumar S/O Sakaldev Sah @ Sakladev Sah R/O Vill.- Gobardhana, P.S.-
                  Shikarpur, Distt.- West Champaran

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Gyan Prakash
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    05-01-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application as during pendency

                    of the same, the petitioner was arrested.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application of the

                    petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.