Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shivam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court grants bail to the petitioner subject to bond and conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Shivam Kumar, was arrested in connection with a theft case (PS Case No. 1086 of 2024) alleging he absconded with 60 grams of gold and Rs. 4 lakh. He sought bail, claiming he was merely a staff member falsely implicated due to unpaid salary dues and that no incriminating material was recovered from him. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent. The court considered the period of custody, the framing of charges, and the petitioner’s claim of false implication. It decided to grant bail on a bond of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions of family surety and mandatory appearance at trial dates.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 considering the nature of the offence, prior antecedent and claim of false implication.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • theft
  • false implication
  • surety
  • prior criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80603 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1086 Year-2024 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Shivam Kumar Son of Late Bachchu Verma Resident Of Village- Gandhi
                 Nagar, Ward No 3, Bus Stand Nawada Ps - Nawada Town, Dist- Nawada

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Ms. Sonam Kumari, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   11-02-2026             Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP

                   for the State. Perused the case diary.

                           2.      The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Nawada P.S. Case No. 1086 of 2024 instituted for the offence

                   under Sections 316(2) & 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

                   2023.

                           3.      The prosecution case, in brief, is that the informant,

                   a jeweller, sent his staff to Kolkata with cash and old gold to

                   retrieve new jewellery from a moneylender. While one staff

                   member        returned,    Shivam       Kumar       (petitioner)     allegedly

                   absconded with 60 grams of gold and Rs. 4 lakh with dishonest

                   intention.

                           4.      It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80603 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                            2/3




          that the petitioner is in custody since 07.12.2024. Petitioner

          bears one criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in

          paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

                  5.      It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s

          counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present

          case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner was merely a staff member working in the informant’s

          shop, and certain dues towards his salary were pending against

          the informant. Owing to non-payment of the said dues, the

          present false and malicious case has been instituted against the

          petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious

          possession of the petitioner. Charge sheet has already been

          submitted in this case, whereafter, charge is also framed in this

          case.

                  6.      Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                  7.      Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and charge being

          framed in this case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the

          petitioner.

                  8.      Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80603 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

                     below/concerned Court in connection with Nawada P.S. Case

                     No. 1086 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

                             (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the

                     family of the petitioner.

                             (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

                     fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two

                     consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the

                     bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                                                 (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Raj Kishore/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.