Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rakesh ChowdharyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner on the condition of furnishing a cash bond and sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Rakesh Chowdhary, was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault, robbery, and illegal possession of arms under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that six accused, including the petitioner, attacked an informant, seized his phone, and fired at him on 19 March 2025. The petitioner, who had been in custody since 6 June 2025 and has seven prior criminal records, claimed he was falsely implicated and that the FIR did not specifically name him. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences and the petitioner’s antecedents. The court, noting the lack of a specific allegation against the petitioner, the simple nature of the injury, and the period of custody, decided to grant bail subject to a cash bond and sureties, with conditions for appearance in court.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite multiple serious charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents preclude bail
  • Whether the FIR specifically implicates the petitioner

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • false implication
  • antecedents
  • Arms Act
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • court order

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80700 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2025 Thana- Babarganj District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
                 Rakesh Chowdhary S/o Late Ganesh Chowdhary Resident of - Kutubganj,
                 Safrullachak, P.S - Babarganj, District - Bhagalpur

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Ritik Shah, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Ms. Sangeeta Sharma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   13-01-2026             Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP

                   for the State.

                           2.       The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Babarganj P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025 instituted for the offence

                   under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 109, 190, 191(2), 191(3)

                   of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the

                   Arms Act.

                           3.       The prosecution case, in short, is that on

                   19.03.2025, while returning after not finding his friend

                   Shubham Sonar at home, informant was stopped by six accused

                   persons who inquired about his friend and then assaulted him,

                   snatched his mobile phone, and resorted to firing, from which he

                   narrowly escaped.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80700 of 2025(4) dt.13-01-2026
                                            2/3




                  4.      It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner

          that the petitioner is in custody since 06.06.2025. Petitioner

          bears seven criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in

          paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

                  5.      It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s

          counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present

          case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from

          perusal of the FIR, it would manifest that there is no specific

          allegation against the petitioner. So far as injury of the injured

          person is concerned, the same is found to be simple in nature.

                  6.      Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                  7.      Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and there being

          no specific allegation against the petitioner, this Court is

          inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                  8.      Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing

          of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of

          Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court

          in connection with Babarganj P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025, subject

          to the following conditions:
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80700 of 2025(4) dt.13-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                             (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the

                     family of the petitioner.

                             (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

                     fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two

                     consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the

                     bail bonds of the petitioner.


                                                                 (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

Raj Kishore/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.