Patna High Court

Laxmi Yadav @ Laxmi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 11 February 2026
Disposal: BAIL REJECTED
Bench: R P MISHRA

Holding

Bail was denied to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Laxmi Yadav, husband of a woman who was allegedly killed by her in‑laws over a dowry demand, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He contended that he has no criminal antecedents, was falsely implicated, and that the charge sheet contains only a general, omnibus allegation against him. The State opposed bail, arguing that as the husband of the deceased he must explain the circumstances of her death. The Court held that the petitioner, being the husband, bears the onus of explanation and found the allegations insufficiently specific to merit bail at this stage. Consequently, the bail application was rejected, the trial was directed to proceed expeditiously, and the petitioner was permitted to renew the bail plea if the trial is not concluded within five months.

Issues considered

The applicability of bail under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 to the petitioner.
Whether the petitioner, as husband of the deceased, bears the onus of explaining the death and thus warrants denial of bail.
Whether the charge sheet contains specific allegations sufficient to justify continued detention.

Legislation cited

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 238, 3(5), 80

Subjects

bail
dowry death
husband
false implication
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
Section 80
Section 238
Section 3(5)
trial expedite

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80705 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-558 Year-2024 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL District-
                                                        Samastipur
                 ======================================================
                 Laxmi Yadav @ Laxmi Kumar S/o Rameshwar Ray R/o Village - Kewas
                 Nizamat, P.S - Samstipur (Muffasil), District - Samstipur


                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus

                 The State of Bihar


                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   11-02-2026             Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP

                   for the State. Perused the case diary.

                           2.      The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Samastipur (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 558 of 2024 instituted for

                   the offence under Sections 80, 238 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya

                   Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                           3.      Prosecution case in short is that daughter of the

                   informant has been done to death at her matrimonial house by

                   her in-laws due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

                           4.      It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner

                   that the petitioner is in custody since 24.04.2025. Petitioner

                   bears no criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80705 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                            2/3




          paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

                  5.      It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s

          counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present

          case. Petitioner is the husband of the deceased. There is no

          specific allegation attributed to the petitioner, rather allegation is

          general and omnibus in nature. Charge sheet has already been

          submitted in this case.

                  6.      Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. It is

          fervently submitted that petitioner, being the husband of the

          deceased, bears the onus of explaining the circumstances

          leading to her death.

                  7.      Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case and taking into account the fact that petitioner, being

          the husband of the deceased, bears the onus of explaining the

          circumstances leading to her death, this Court is not inclined to

          grant bail at this stage. Prayer for bail is hereby rejected.

                  8.      The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial as

          expeditiously as possible without any undue delay and

          unnecessary adjournments.

                  9.       However, petitioner will be at liberty to renew his

          prayer for bail, if the trial is not concluded within a period of
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80705 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     five months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this

                     order.


                                                                 (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

Raj Kishore/-

U      T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…