Patna High Court
Niraj Yadav @ Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
Anticipatory bail is denied as the injury caused to the informant is grievous.
Summary
The petitioner, Niraj Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (Telhara P.S. Case No. 89 of 2025) filed under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He was alleged to have assaulted an informant, causing a grievous head injury. The court examined the seriousness of the injury and the nature of the offences alleged. It held that the grievous injury warranted denial of anticipatory bail. Consequently, the petition for anticipatory bail was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner given the alleged assault causing grievous injury to the informant
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita — s. 109(1), 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 190, 191(2), 303(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- grievous injury
- assault
- criminal procedure
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- bail denial
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80711 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2025 Thana- TELHARA District- Nalanda
======================================================
Niraj Yadav @ Niraj Kumar S/o Sahjanand Yadav R/o Village - Dharambigha,
Police Station - Telhara, District - Nalanda
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the State : Mr.Kalyan Shankar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
4 10-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection
with Telhara P.S. Case No. 89 of 2025 instituted under Sections
191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 303(2), 351(3),
352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. The petitioner is said to have assaulted the
informant on his head causing grievous injury.
4. Considering the fact that the injury caused to the
informant is grievous in nature, I am not inclined to grant
anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.
P. Kumar (Sandeep Kumar, J)
U T
Checking your session…