Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to a bond, sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Summary

Manoj Kumar, the father‑in‑law of a woman who died in a dowry‑related case, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the BNS. The prosecution alleged his involvement in the dowry death, while the petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal antecedent, and that the deceased’s husband was already in judicial custody. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the suspicion alone should not justify denial of bail and that he would cooperate with the investigation. The State opposed the bail, asserting the seriousness of the charges. Considering the circumstances, the court ordered that the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to the conditions of Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the BNS.
  • Whether the petitioner is likely to tamper with evidence or influence the investigation.
  • Whether the conditions prescribed under Section 482(2) of the BNSS justify the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

  • BNS — s. 238, 3(5), 80
  • BNSS — s. 482(2)

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • dowry death
  • false implication
  • Section 80
  • Section 238
  • Section 3(5)
  • Section 482
  • High Court
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81248 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-223 Year-2025 Thana- BIKRAM District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Manoj Kumar Son of Rajnath Singh R/o Village - Udarchak, P.S.- Bikram,
                 District - Patna.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ram Niwas Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Madan Kumar, APP
                 For the Informant        :       Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-01-2026                        Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                   A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

                                2. The petitioner apprehend his arrest in connection

                   with Bikram P.S. Case No. 223 of 2025 instituted under

                   Sections 80, 238 & 3(5) of the BNS.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the accused persons

                   including the petitioner committed dowry death of the daughter

                   of the informant.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

                   case only on the basis of suspicion. He further submits that the

                   petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased and he has no concern

                   with the affairs of the deceased and her husband. He submits
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81248 of 2025(2) dt.08-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                     that the minor children of the deceased are with the father-in-

                     law and mother-in-law of the deceased who are taking care of

                     them. He further submits that the husband of the deceased is in

                     judicial custody since 30.10.2025. He further submits that the

                     petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he undertakes to

                     cooperate in the trial and investigation and also undertakes not

                     to temper with the evidence.

                                  5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

                     anticipatory bail.

                                  6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

                     and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event

                     of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks

                     from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing

                     bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

                     sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the

                     learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Danapur, Patna in connection with Bikram

                     P.S. Case No. 223 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down

                     in Section 482(2) of the BNSS.



                                             (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
AjayMishra/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.