Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rajnish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Rajnish Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No. 219 of 2019). The petitioner, represented by Mr. Arvind Kumar, later sought permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the State, Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, was present. Justice Satyavrat Verma granted the request to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, without addressing the merits of the bail application.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81475 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-219 Year-2019 Thana- PALIGANJ District- Patna
                  ======================================================
                  Rajnish Kumar, son of Shri Vinod Singh Resident of Village- Paipura, Kala,
                  Ps- Paliganj, Dist- Patna, At present R/o- Ram Dayal, Enclave, block-A, Flat
                  No. 501, Saguna More, Ps- Danapur, Dist- Patna

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Arvind Kumar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    09-01-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, after some

                    argument, seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory

                    bail application.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.


                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.