Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pulice YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Pulice Yadav was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. He sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The court entertained the request, granted permission to withdraw, and consequently dismissed the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the bail application were considered. The order effectively disposes of the petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw his anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of bail application
  • criminal procedure
  • bail
  • High Court order

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82547 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2024 Thana- KHARIK District- Bhagalpur
                  ======================================================
                  Pulice Yadav S/o Barun Yadav R/o vill - Jamaldipur, P.S.- Kharik, Dist.-
                  Bhagalpur

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Rajesh Kumar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    10-02-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner, as

                    petitioner was arrested during pendency of the same.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.