Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sweta Kumari @ Sweta DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Given the nature of the allegations and the petitioners’ clean antecedent, the Court held that anticipatory bail is warranted.

Summary

The petitioners, who are neighbours, feared arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita alleging that they disrobed, assaulted an informant causing a finger fracture and snatched her gold chain. They contended that the incident stemmed from a petty domestic dispute, that the allegations were vague and ornamental, and that they have a clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail application. The Court examined the nature of the accusations, the petitioners’ clean record and the lack of specific overt acts. Finding the allegations insufficient to deny bail, the Court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bail‑bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The order directs that if the petitioners are arrested within eight weeks, they shall be released on bail on compliance with the stipulated conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners despite the FIR alleging assault, grievous hurt and theft under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Whether the nature of the allegations and the petitioners’ clean antecedent justify the grant of bail under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • assault
  • theft
  • clean antecedent
  • Bihar
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82632 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka
                 ======================================================
           1.     Sweta Kumari @ Sweta Devi W/O Anupam @ Sanjiv Kumar Resident Of
                  Village- Muradpur (Choti), P.S- Rajoun, Distt.- Banka.
           2.    Aastha @ Aastha Rani D/O Anupam @ Sajiv Kumar Resident Of Village-
                 Muradpur (Choti), P.S- Rajoun, Distt.- Banka.
           3.    Anupam @ Sanjiv Kumar S/O Shri Raghuveer Prasad Singh Resident Of
                 Village- Muradpur (Choti), P.S- Rajoun, Distt.- Banka.
           4.    Anish @ Anish Patel @ Sanni S/o Anupam @ Sanjiv Kumar Resident Of
                 Village- Muradpur (Choti), P.S- Rajoun, Distt.- Banka.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Saurabh Raj, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   05-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

                   State.

                                2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for

                   the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2),

                   76, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

                                3. As per F.I.R., these petitioners disrobed and

                   assaulted informant due to which she sustained fracture on her

                   finger. It is further submitted that these petitioners also snatched

                   gold chain from the neck of informant.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82632 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026
                                                        2/2




                      petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Both

                      parties are close-door neighbours and due to petty dispute,

                      altercation took place between them. Allegation of assault is

                      general and omnibus and there is no specific allegation of overt

                      act against these petitioners. Rest of the allegations are

                      ornamental only to make the case grave. Petitioners claim clean

                      antecedent.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed

                      the bail application.

                                   6. Considering the nature of accusation and clean

                      antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that

                      let the above named petitioners in the event of their

                      arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight

                      weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond

                      of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like

                      amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate,

                      Banka in connection with Rajoun P. S. Case No. 26 of 2025,

                      subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the

                      Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.



                                            (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.