Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sunil Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The High Court granted pre‑arrest bail to the petitioner subject to the stipulated bond and sureties.

Summary

Sunil Kumar Sah was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 11.54 litres of illicit foreign liquor from his house, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that the case was false, motivated by personal enmity, and that other members of his joint family might have hidden the liquor. The State opposed his request for pre‑arrest bail. The High Court, noting the family circumstances and the State's failure to implement its liquor policy, granted pre‑arrest bail subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and directed the district court to verify any prior criminal antecedents. The order will lapse automatically if any undisclosed case is found, and the bail application was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to pre‑arrest bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the circumstances of a joint family and alleged false case justify granting bail.
  • Whether the High Court may impose conditions under Section 482(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • pre‑arrest bail
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • joint family
  • false case allegation
  • Section 482(2) CrPC

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8276 of 2026

                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-230 Year-2025 Thana- EXCISE BAARSOI District- Katihar
                 ======================================================
                 Sunil Kumar Sah, aged about 35 years, Gender-Male, S/O Late Gaur Sah,
                 R/O Village- Bhogaon, Ward no. 03, P.S.- Kadwa, District- Katihar.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-02-2026                                Heard Mr. Praveen Kumar, learned counsel

                   appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Mritunjay Kumar

                   Nirala, learned APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection

                   with Barsoi Excise P.S. Case No. 230 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition

                   and Excise Act as amended up-to-date.

                                 3. Allegation is of recovery of 11.54 litres of illicit

                   foreign liquor from the Baramdah of the house of the petitioner.

                                 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submits that due to enmity, the petitioner has been

                   planted in a false case. Petitioner has no concern with the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8276 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026
                                            2/3




          alleged seized liquor nor he is involved in trade of liquor in any

          manner. He further submitted that that petitioner resides in a

          joint family and some other members of the family may have

          hid the liquor. On these grounds, petitioner seeks to be released

          on pre-arrest bail.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the rival submissions made on behalf

          of the parties, as well as, the fact that petitioner resides in a joint

          family and some other members of the family may have hid the

          liquor and also the fact that the State has failed to implement its

          liquor policy in its true spirit, the petitioner, above named, is

          directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his/her

          arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a

          period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District Court

          where the case is pending, in connection with Barsoi Excise P.S.

          Case No. 230 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down

          under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

                       7. The learned District Court is directed to verify

          the criminal antecedent of the petitioner as stated in

          paragraph no. 3 of the bail application. If any other case is
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8276 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026
                                                          3/3




                        pending against the petitioner as what has been stated in

                        paragraph no. 3, this order will lose its force automatically.

                                     8. The present bail application is disposed of.



                                                  (Purnendu Singh, J)
Niraj/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.