Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

MANGARU BIND @ MANGARU PRASADversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Mangaru Bind applied for anticipatory bail under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • Criminal Procedure Code

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83051 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2025 Thana- NUAOW District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
                  ======================================================
                  MANGARU BIND @ MANGARU PRASAD S/O VIJAY BIND R/O
                  VILLAGE- SONBARSA, P.S.- NUAO, DISTRICT- KAIMUR AT BHABUA

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  THE STATE OF BIHAR PATNA

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Tribhuwan Narayan
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    19-01-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                              2.    Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, as petitioner was

                    arrested during pendency of the instant anticipatory bail

                    application.

                              3.    Permission is accorded.

                              4.    Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.