Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ram Krishna Kumar @ Ram Krishna Sah @ JalwaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, finding insufficient direct evidence of his possession of the contraband and noting that the NDPS Act does not apply.

Summary

The petitioner, Ram Krishna Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of 33 litres of liquor, 28 litres of cough syrup, a pistol and live cartridges recovered from his joint family house. He sought bail, contending that no incriminating items were found in his personal possession and that his name was linked only through a co-accused's confession. The State opposed bail, relying on the charge‑sheet under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and the Arms Act, and cited a gazette notification treating certain medicines as intoxicants. The court noted that the NDPS Act did not apply and that there was no compliance with Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Considering the lack of direct evidence against the petitioner and the period of custody already served, the court granted bail with conditions. The petitioner was released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties and complying with stipulated conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and the Arms Act.
  • Whether the NDPS Act is applicable to the present case.
  • Whether the provisions of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, have been complied with.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Arms Act
  • confessional statement
  • joint family house
  • Section 103
  • NDPS Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83083 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-993 Year-2025 Thana- SAHARSA SADAR District- Saharsa
                 ======================================================
                 Ram Krishna Kumar @ Ram Krishna Sah @ Jalwa S/O Jai Narayan Sah
                 Resident Of Gandhi Path Ward No. 14, P.s.- Saharsa, District- Saharsa



                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus

                 The State of Bihar



                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   19-01-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                               2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Saharsa

                   P.S. Case No. 993 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable

                   under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and

                   25(1-b)a, 26(2), 35 of the Arms Act.

                               3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 33 litres

                   of liquor, 28 litres of cough syrup, one country-made pistol and

                   42 live cartridges have been recovered from the house of the

                   petitioner.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83083 of 2025(3) dt.19-01-2026
                                            2/4




          petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No

          incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious

          possession of the petitioner. The name of the petitioner

          transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of

          the apprehended co-accused. Learned counsel further submitted

          that the recovery has been made from the joint house of the

          petitioner where other family members of the petitioner also

          reside. Learned counsel further submitted that police after

          investigation have submitted charge-sheet under the provisions

          of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Arms Act. The

          petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery. The

          petitioner is in custody since 30.08.2024 and has four criminal

          antecedents. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the

          Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

                     5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. Learned APP further

          submitted that charge-sheet has been submitted in this case

          under the provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act as

          also of the Arms Act. Learned APP further submitted that vide

          gazette notification dated 18.10.2016, the Government of Bihar

          has notified that all medicines or medical preparations

          containing (i) Codeine and (ii) Dextropropoxyphene as
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83083 of 2025(3) dt.19-01-2026
                                            3/4




          ingredients be treated to be intoxicants for the purposes of the

          Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

                       6. From a perusal of the records, it appears that the

          present case has been instituted under the provision of the Bihar

          Prohibition and Excise Act along with the provisions of Arms

          Act and upon completion of investigation, the police have

          submitted charge sheet under the same provisions. Therefore,

          the provisions of the NDPS Act are neither attracted nor

          applicable to the present case.

                     7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

          the case as also the period of custody undergone by the

          petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                       8. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

          below/concerned Court in connection with Saharsa P.S. Case

          No. 993 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:

                       (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of

          the family of the petitioner.

                       (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

          fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two

          consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83083 of 2025(3) dt.19-01-2026
                                                       4/4




                     bail bonds of the petitioner.

                                  (III) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                     witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                     for cancellation of bail.



                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Alok Verma/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.