Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sanjeev Kumar Ray @ Sanjeev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

Anticipatory bail is not granted as the injury to the victim is grievous.

Summary

The petitioners, Sanjeev Kumar Ray and Vikash Kumar Ray, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS‑Musrigharari Case No.66 of 2025) alleging assault under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the accused had assaulted the victim, causing grievous injuries. The petitioners contended they had not assaulted anyone and possessed a clean antecedent. The court examined the seriousness of the injury and concluded that the circumstances did not warrant anticipatory bail. Consequently, the application was dismissed and the petitioners were ordered to surrender within four weeks to seek regular bail, failing which the police would arrest them.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners in view of the alleged assault and grievous injury to the victim under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • assault
  • grievous injury
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83668 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2025 Thana- MUSRIGHRARI District- Samastipur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Sanjeev Kumar Ray @ Sanjeev Kumar S/o- Sundeshvar Ray Village-
                  Barhatta PS-Musrigharari Distt- Samastipur
           2.    Vikash Kumar Ray @ Vikash Kumar S/o- Raju Ray @ Raju Kumar Ray
                 Village- Barhatta PS-Musrigharari Distt- Samastipur

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Madhav Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   13-03-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection

                   with Musrigharari P.S. Case No. 66 of 2025 instituted under

                   Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5)

                   of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, accused persons have

                   assaulted the victim

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   the petitioners have not assaulted anyone. Petitioners have

                   clean antecedent.

                                5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83668 of 2025(5) dt.13-03-2026
                                                          2/2




                        for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

                                     6. Considering the fact that the injury sustained by

                        victim is grievous in nature, this is not a fit case for grant of

                        anticipatory bail.

                                     7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

                                     8. The petitioners is directed to surrender within four

                        weeks from today and pray for regular bail, failing which the

                        Superintendent of Police, Samastipur will take all steps for

                        arrest of the petitioners.

                                     9. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the

                        Superintendent of Police, Samastipur through FAX or e-mail for

                        its compliance.



                                                   (Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.