Patna High Court
Satyam SauravversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The Court refused to entertain the second anticipatory bail application.
Summary
The petitioner, Satyam Saurav, filed a second application for anticipatory bail before the Patna High Court after his earlier application (Cr. Misc. No.65850 of 2025) was withdrawn by order dated 17.09.2025. He argued that the withdrawal was voluntary and sought relief again. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner contended that the second application should be entertained. The Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, held that it was not inclined to consider a second anticipatory bail application on the same facts. Consequently, the petition for anticipatory bail was rejected.
Issues considered
- Whether a second application for anticipatory bail can be entertained after a prior application was withdrawn.
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal of application
- second application
- criminal procedure
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84122 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- East Champaran
======================================================
Satyam Saurav Son of Sunil Kumar Srivastava Resident of village-
Raghunathpur, Chamda Godam, P.S- Raghunathpur Dist- East Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ansul- Sr. Advocate
Mr. Anuj Kumar- Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan- A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 09-01-2026 1. Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner
and learned APP for the State.
2. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner
submits that petitioner had earlier moved before this Court
seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.65850 of
2025, but the same was permitted to be withdrawn by an
order dated 17.09.2025. It is further submitted that this is
the second attempt of the petitioner to seek anticipatory
bail.
3. The Court is not inclined to entertain the second
anticipatory bail application.
4. The prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84122 of 2025(2) dt.09-01-2026
2/2
stands rejected.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-
U T
Checking your session…