Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ravi Kumar @ Kavi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, dismissing it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, had filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted the permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw his anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 438
  • arrest

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8446 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2025 Thana- SOHSARAI District- Nalanda
                  ======================================================
                  Ravi Kumar @ Kavi Kumar S/o Subhash Prasad @ Shubhash Mahto Resident
                  of village-Murtujiganj Maila khaddha, Post office-Mehandiganj, Police
                  Station-Patna City, District-Patna Bihar
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
            1.     The State of Bihar
            2.     Ravi Ranjan Kumar S/o Arjun Mahto R/o Nun Ka Chauraha, Shisha Ka
                   Sipal, P.S.- Khajekalan, Distt.- Patna, Bihar
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Aklavya Chandan Kumar, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms. Renu Kumari, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    25-02-2026                        1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                                      2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

                    that petitioner during pendency of the anticipatory bail

                    application was arrested, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the

                    same.

                                    3. Permission is accorded.

                                    4. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                          (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.