Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Parwati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court allowed the anticipatory bail application, granting bail subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

Petitioner Parwati Devi applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., arising from a land dispute where the informant alleged looting of wheat crops. The petitioner argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the matter is essentially civil, with the criminal allegations being false and general. The State opposed the bail, contending the seriousness of the offences. The Court, after considering the submissions, directed that the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. The application for anticipatory bail was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of the alleged offences and the nature of the dispute.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • land dispute
  • false implication
  • Section 482
  • bail conditions
  • civil dispute criminal colour

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85105 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2025 Thana- CHAUTHAM District- Khagaria
                 ======================================================
                 Parwati Devi W/o Patel Singh Resident of Village - Sonvarsha, P.S -
                 Chautham, District - Khagaria

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Santosh Kumar Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-02-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of her

                   arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),3(5) of the B.N.S.

                                3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman

                   and from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would

                   manifest that the dispute is civil in nature to which a criminal

                   colour has been given. It is next submitted that the informant is

                   claiming that the land in dispute belongs to him while Hemraj

                   claimed that he purchased the land from Nawal Sah in the Year

                   1997 and in pursuance whereof, Jamabandi in the name of

                   Hemraj was created. Further, Ram Swaroop Singh is purchaser
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85105 of 2025(2) dt.06-02-2026
                                            2/3




          of the land in dispute from Hemraj. It is further submitted that

          as far as Bipin Singh is concerned, against him it is alleged that

          he looted the wheat crop of the informant from the land in

          dispute. It is also alleged that earlier Patel Singh had also looted

          his wheat crop.

                       4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

          informant being wife of Patel Singh. It is also submitted that

          allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus in

          nature. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather

          will cooperate in the investigation to prove her innocence.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail

          application.

                       6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

          counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the

          event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

          within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail

          on her furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees

          Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is

          pending/successor Court in connection with Chautham P. S.

          Case No.100 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85105 of 2025(2) dt.06-02-2026
                                                           3/3




                         Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

                                      7. The application stands allowed.



                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.