Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kaushik Kumar @ Kaushik Kumar MishraversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Kaushik Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 17-02-2026, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. No further orders were made.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory bail application pending before the court

Judgment

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85124 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-282 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali
                   ======================================================
                   Kaushik Kumar @ Kaushik Kumar Mishra Son of Mahesh Mishra @ Mahesh
                   Harishankar Mishra Resident of village- Ward No 03 Loma Rajapakar PS-
                   Baranti Rajapakar District -Vaishali

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                   The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party/s
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Shanti Bhushan Singh, Advocate
                   For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP
                   ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                         ORAL ORDER

2     17-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                     APP for the State.

                                  2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some

                     arguments,       seeks     permission        to    withdraw       the     instant

                     anticipatory bail application.

                                  3. Permission is accorded.

                                  4. The instant anticipatory bail application is

                     dismissed as withdrawn.


                                                (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Sanjay/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.