Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Suryajeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail is granted subject to compliance with the mediation settlement and the conditions of Section 438(2) CrPC.

Summary

The petitioner, Suryajeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (Gaurichak PS Case No. 503 of 2022) alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 34 IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner demanded Rs 5 lakhs as dowry, tortured his wife and evicted her from the matrimonial home. The petitioner contended innocence and submitted that the matter had been referred to mediation, resulting in an amicable settlement signed by both parties on 22‑04‑2026. The respondent’s counsel concurred with the settlement. The Court, noting the compromise and the mediation report, granted anticipatory bail subject to compliance with the settlement terms and the conditions of Section 438(2) CrPC, directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted in a dowry‑related criminal case where the parties have reached a mediated settlement.
  • Whether the conditions imposed under Section 438(2) CrPC are sufficient to safeguard the interests of justice in the presence of a compromise.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • dowry harassment
  • mediation
  • compromise
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 438
  • Indian Penal Code
  • family law

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85280 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-503 Year-2022 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Suryajeet Kumar S/o Shri Uttam Kumar Resident of - Beldarichak, P.S -
                 Gaurichak, District - Patna

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Puja Kumari D/o Shri Vidya Nand Bind R/o Village - Kachiyama, P.S -
                 Hilsa, District - Nalanda

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   04-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the parties concerned.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Gaurichak Police Station Case No. 503 of 2022, dated

                   03.08.2022, registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 341, 323, 498(A), 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code

                   and Section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act.

                                3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the marriage

                   of the informant was solemnized with the petitioner in the year

                   2019 as per Hindu rites and rituals. After one year of cordial

                   relations, the petitioner and his family members started

                   demanding Rs. 5 lakhs for business purposes and due to non-

                   fulfilment of the demand, tortured the informant physically as
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85280 of 2025(4) dt.04-05-2026
                                            2/3




          well as mentally and ultimately ousted her from the matrimonial

          home. Thereafter, the informant returned to her parental house

          and subsequently went to the police station.

                       4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

          case inasmuch as he has not committed any offence in the

          manner alleged. He further submits that the matter was sent for

          mediation by this Court vide order dated 07.01.2026 and final

          mediation report is on record (flag-‘M”). From perusal of the

          same it appears that both husband and wife arrived at amicable

          settlement and have jointly signed the agreement containing

          terms and conditions of compromise on 22.04.2026.

                       5. Learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2 supports the

          argument of learned counsel for the petitioner regarding

          amicable settlement arrived at between the parties through the

          process of mediation.

                       6. Considering the fact that the matter has been

          compromised and both husband and wife has arrived at

          amicable settlement before the learned Mediator and mediation

          report has been submitted by the learned Mediator having the

          terms and conditions of compromise, I am inclined to grant the

          petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail subject to the condition
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85280 of 2025(4) dt.04-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     that the parties shall abide by the terms and conditions entered

                     into between them before the learned Mediator mentioned in the

                     mediation report dated 27.04.2026.

                                  7. Accordingly, the prayer for bail allowed.

                                  8. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his

                     arrest or surrender before the Court below within four weeks, be

                     released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

                     Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                     satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II,

                     Patna City, in connection with Gaurichak Police Station Case

                     No. 503 of 2022, subject to the condition laid down under

                     Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.



                                              (Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
Siwani/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.