Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ramroop @ Rohan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Summary

The petitioner, Ramroop @ Rohan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging destruction of a boundary wall, assault, and firing a rifle at an informant over a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, attacked the informant and discharged a firearm, invoking multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner contended he was falsely implicated due to village politics, was not present at the scene, and had no incriminating material or prior record. The State opposed the bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the offences. Considering the facts and submissions, the court granted anticipatory bail, subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the serious nature of the offences alleged under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the Arms Act
  • Whether the petitioner poses a risk of fleeing, tampering with evidence, or committing further offences

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal procedure
  • land dispute
  • assault
  • firearms
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • Arms Act
  • false implication
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85297 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2025 Thana- DEEPNAGAR District- Nalanda
                 ======================================================
                 Ramroop @ Rohan Kumar S/o Satyendra Kumar R/o Village- Daroga Bigha,
                 P.S.- Deepnagar, District- Nalanda, Bihar.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Advocate.
                                                 Mr. Chetan Anand, Advocate.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-01-2026                   1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Deepnagar P.S. Case No.93 of 2025 instituted under

                   Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 324(4), 61(2), 352, 351(2),

                   351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, as soon as informant

                   came to know that some antisocial elements are trying to

                   capture his land situated in Mauza Kalyanpur, he reached there

                   and saw that petitioner alongwith other unknown persons were

                   destroying the boundary wall of his land and when the

                   informant stopped to do so, the petitioner and others started

                   assaulting him. It is further alleged that the petitioner taken rifle
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85297 of 2025(2) dt.07-01-2026
                                            2/3




          from his vehicle and opened fire on the informant and threaten

          to left the place.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

          case due to village politics. He further submits that the

          petitioner has no concern with the land in question and

          petitioner was neither present on the spot nor any incriminating

          material has been recovered from his conscious possession.

          Learned counsel submits that allegation of firing is super

          addition and ornamental. No injury has been caused to the

          person of informant. He further submits that petitioner has got

          clean antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the

          investigation and trial of the case.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

          and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event

          of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks

          from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the

          learned A.C.J.M.-I, Bihar Sharif (Nalanda) in connection with
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85297 of 2025(2) dt.07-01-2026
                                                          3/3




                        Deepnagar P.S. Case No.93 of 2025, subject to the conditions

                        laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

                        Sanhita, 2023.



                                                (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.