Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sanjeev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court grants bail to the petitioners.

Summary

The petitioners, Sanjeev Kumar and co‑accused, were arrested in Bodhgaya for alleged gambling and drunkenness, with cards, cash and a motorcycle recovered from a community hall. They sought bail, claiming innocence, lack of any incriminating material in their possession, a clean antecedent, and that another co‑accused had already been bailed. The State opposed bail, citing offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, the Gambling Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The Court considered the nature of the offences, the petitioners' custody period, and the absence of material directly linked to them, as well as non‑compliance with Section 103 of the BNS. Accordingly, the Court granted bail, directing each petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs 15,000 with two sureties of the same amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Sections 318(4), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Sections 3/4 of the Gambling Act and Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • gambling
  • prohibition
  • excise
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • Section 103
  • public place
  • possession

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85346 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-737 Year-2025 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Sanjeev Kumar S/O Ramdeo Yadav R/O Village- Sizua, P.S.- Bodhgaya,
                 District -Gaya ji.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Prithivi Raj Singh, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   22-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Bodhgaya

                   P.S. Case No. 737 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable

                   under Sections 318(4), 3(5) of the BNS, under Section-3/4 of

                   Gambling Act and Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise

                   Act.

                                3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the accused

                   were caught gambling during police patrolling and were found in a

                   drunken state. It is further alleged that there is recovery of playing

                   cards and cash as also motorcycle from the spot.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

                   petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85346 of 2025(3) dt.22-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                     the conscious possession of the petitioners rather the recovery has

                     been made from the community hall which is a public place and is

                     accessible to public at large. The petitioners are in custody since

                     22.10.2025 and have got clean antecedent. Learned counsel for the

                     petitioners further submits that other co- accused has been granted

                     bail by this Court vide order dated 04.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc.

                     No. 85095 of 2025. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the

                     Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

                                  5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

                     the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

                                  6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

                     the case, claim based on parity and the period of custody

                     undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to

                     the petitioners.

                                  7. Let the petitioners be released on bail, on furnishing

                     bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with

                     two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

                     below/concerned Court in connection with Bodhgaya P.S. Case No.

                     737 of 2025.



                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Siddharth Soni/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.