Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shabana Khatoon @ Shabana KhatunversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that the petitioner is entitled to bail as the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case of guilt.

Summary

The petitioner, Shabana Khatoon, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 143, 61(2)(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging involvement in human trafficking. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, was engaged in human trafficking, but the FIR lacked specific details about any victim and no victim statements were recorded. The petitioner’s counsel argued that she was falsely implicated, had no criminal antecedent, and had been in judicial custody since September 2025. The State opposed the bail, contending the seriousness of the alleged offence. After hearing both sides, the Court found insufficient material to justify continued detention and ordered the petitioner to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite the serious nature of the alleged human trafficking offence
  • Whether the material on record establishes a prima facie case warranting denial of bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • human trafficking
  • criminal procedure
  • presumption of innocence
  • bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8614 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-213 Year-2025 Thana- PATKHAULI District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Shabana Khatoon @ Shabana Khatun W/o Afzal Khan @ Afzab khan
                 Resident of Village - Pirpati, Police Station - Yogapatti, District - West
                 Champaran

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Prithvi Nath Mishra, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-02-2026                Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra

                   Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in

                   connection with Pathkhauli P.S. Case No. 213 of 2025 registered

                   for the offence punishable under Sections 143, 61(2) (3) and 3(5)

                   of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the

                   petitioner along with others are indulged in human trafficking.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                   has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

                   offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned

                   counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the FIR, it

                   is not clear as to whom the petitioner has trafficked. A general

                   story has been created that the petitioner and others are indulged
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8614 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                      in human trafficking. There is no complaint from anybody and

                      from perusal of the order of the learned trial court also, it

                      transpires that during the course of investigation, no victim has

                      given her statement regarding the alleged occurrence. Moreover,

                      a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner

                      has no criminal antecedent and she is languishing in judicial

                      custody since 03.09.2025.

                                   5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                      for the State.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.         The above named

                      petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                      bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of

                      the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional

                      Chief Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bagaha, West Champaran in

                      connection with Pathkhauli P.S. Case No. 213 of 2025.



                                             (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
durgesh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.