Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nikhil Kumar Chaurasiya @ Nikhil Bhagat @ Nikhil Kumar BhaktaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The Court rejected the petition for anticipatory bail.

Summary

The petitioners—Nikhil Kumar Chaurasiya, Guddu Chauraisa and Javed Mian—applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, alleging they were falsely implicated in a stabbing incident. They argued that the police investigation concluded with a final report exonerating them, and that only Nikhil and Vinit were alleged to have stabbed the informant and his brother, while the other petitioners were merely said to have caught the informant. The State and the informant opposed the bail, contending that the FIR specifically alleges stabbing by Nikhil and Vinit and that the injuries were grievous, and that the trial court had rightly taken cognizance despite the police report. After hearing both sides, the High Court held that anticipatory bail could not be granted in the circumstances. Consequently, the petition for anticipatory bail was rejected.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when the police final report exonerates the accused but the trial court has taken cognizance of the FIR.
  • Whether individuals alleged only to have caught the informant, and not to have committed the stabbing, are eligible for anticipatory bail.
  • Whether the seriousness of alleged grievous injuries precludes the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

  • Indian Penal Code — s. 109, 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 126(2), 303(2), 3(5), 351(2), 352

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Indian Penal Code
  • false implication
  • police exoneration
  • trial court cognizance
  • grievous injury

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86168 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-265 Year-2024 Thana- KHAIRA District- Saran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Nikhil Kumar Chaurasiya @ Nikhil Bhagat @ Nikhil Kumar Bhakta Son of
                  Babban Chaurasiya @ Babban Bhakta Resident of Village - Khaira, P.S.-
                  Khaira, District - Saran.
           2.    Guddu Chaurasiya Son of Jayanath Chaurasiya Resident of Village - Khaira,
                 P.S.- Khaira, District - Saran.
           3.    Javed Mian Son of Hakka Miyan Resident of Village - Khaira, P.S.- Khaira,
                 District - Saran.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Ravi Kant Singh Ranjit Kumar Singh R/o Village- Mira Musehari, P.S.-
                 Chhapra (Muffasil), District- Saran

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Sri Krishna Prasad Singh
                                                   Mr. Rakesh Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad- A.P.P.
                                                   Mr. Milind Raj Dixit
                                                   Mr. A.K. Mantu
                                                   Mr. S.K. Chaubey
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   01-05-2026                   1. Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners,

                   learned APP for the State and the learned counsel appearing

                   on behalf of the informant.

                                 2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their

                   arrest in Khaira P. S. Case No.265 of 2024 registered for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 109, 303(2), 126(2),

                   115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.

                                 3. The learned senior counsel for the petitioners
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86168 of 2025(4) dt.01-05-2026
                                            2/4




          submits that the petitioners are persons with clean

          antecedent and in sum and substance the allegation is that

          Nazim and Dipu caught the informant and Nikhil stabbed

          him. Further, petitioner nos.2 and 3 caught the brother of

          the informant and Vinit stabbed his brother namely, Anuj.

                       4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits

          that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant

          case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal

          of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest

          that specific allegation of stabbing the informant and his

          brother is against Nikhil and Vinit, but then as far as

          petitioner nos.2 and 3 are concerned, they are alleged to

          have caught the informant, hence allegation of stabbing is

          not against them. It is also submitted that police after

          investigation        submitted          final   form   exonerating   the

          petitioners of the allegations as alleged in the FIR but then

          the learned trial Court differing with the police report took

          cognizance based on which petitioners apprehend arrest. It

          is further submitted that when one investigating agency

          after investigating the case came to a considered conclusion

          that petitioners are innocent whether it would be prudent for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86168 of 2025(4) dt.01-05-2026
                                            3/4




          the Court to send the petitioners to jail based when they are

          are not alleged to have stabbed the victim.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. Sri Chandra Bhushan Prasad as

          well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

          informant vehemently opposes the anticipatory bail

          application and submits that no doubt final form

          exonerating the petitioners has been submitted by the police

          but then in the FIR, it is specifically alleged that informant

          and his brother Anuj were stabbed by Nikhil and Vinit. It is

          also submitted that injury suffered by the injured has been

          opined to be grievous in nature. It is next submitted that

          learned trial Court differing with the police report has taken

          cognizance. It is next submitted that though petitioner nos.2

          and 3 are not alleged to have stabbed the victim but then are

          alleged to have caught the victim on account of which it

          became possible for Nikhil and Vinit to commit the

          occurrence of stabbing. It is also submitted that it absolutely

          does not stand to reason that as to why the informant would

          have implicated someone who had not stabbed him and was

          not associated with the occurrence.

                       6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties,
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86168 of 2025(4) dt.01-05-2026
                                                           4/4




                         the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of

                         anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

                                      7. The prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory

                         bail stands rejected.



                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.