Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Babita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted because the victim’s statement did not support the prosecution and the petitioners have clean antecedents.

Summary

Babita Devi and Alok Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging that they were implicated in the alleged kidnapping of the informant’s minor daughter. The informant claimed the daughter was abducted, but the girl was later recovered and, under Section 183 of the B.N.S., gave a statement that did not support the prosecution’s case. The petitioners argued they have clean antecedents, and the petitioner‑1 is a woman, further contending that the allegations are general and omnibus. The State’s counsel could not rebut the fact that the victim’s statement was adverse to the prosecution. Relying on the victim’s non‑supportive statement and the petitioners’ clean record, the Court directed that anticipatory bail be granted subject to bail‑bond and surety conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S. The application was allowed.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriateness of granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners under Sections 137(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.?
  • Does the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 B.N.S. affect the merits of the prosecution’s case?
  • Are the petitioners’ clean antecedents and the gender of petitioner‑1 relevant factors for anticipatory bail?

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 137(2), 183, 3(5), 482(2)

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • kidnapping
  • victim statement
  • clean antecedent
  • Section 137
  • Section 3(5)
  • Section 183
  • Section 482
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86184 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-223 Year-2025 Thana- MANSI District- Khagaria
                 ======================================================
           1.     Babita Devi W/o Dilip Singh Resident of Village - Dharamchak, P.S -
                  Mansi, District - Khagaria
           2.    Alok Kumar S/o Dilip Singh Resident of Village - Dharamchak, P.S - Mansi,
                 District - Khagaria

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Pankaj Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms.Asha Devi
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   23-02-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their

                   arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 137(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

                                3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner

                   no.1 is a woman and the informant in sum and substance alleges

                   that his minor daughter was kidnapped by the accused persons

                   including the petitioners.

                                4. It is submitted that daughter of the informant was

                   in love with Gokul and had eloped. It is further submitted that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86184 of 2025(5) dt.23-02-2026
                                            2/3




          the victim has been recovered and her statement has been

          recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S. wherein she has not

          supported the case of the prosecution and has been sent to

          Remand Home, Bhagalpur. It is further submitted that petitioner

          no.1, being aunt of Gokul, came to be implicated with general

          and omnibus allegation.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. is not in a position to rebut the

          submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

          petitioner based on instruction that the victim has been

          recovered and her statement has been recorded under Section

          183 BNSS wherein she has not supported the case of the

          prosecution.

                       6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

          counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the

          event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

          within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on

          anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.

          5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court

          where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with

          Mansi P. S. Case No.223 of 2025 corresponding to GR No.2675

          of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86184 of 2025(5) dt.23-02-2026
                                                           3/3




                         482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

                                      7. The application stands allowed.



                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.